web statistics
Radical Labels, are we Entitled, or are we The Title? - Benjamin Doolittle

Radical Labels, are we Entitled, or are we The Title?

Radical Labels, are we Entitled, or are we The Title?

When choosing to express upon a peoples position in a certain light just to cast shadows of doubt in the mind of the reader, It is thought wise to fictionalize the characters to diminish the value of the person, thing or subject.

This is a typical concept and political ploy to undermine and limit the real people and real events, and for a price the hidden hand can influence what is featured in the media to create or mold a general public opinion in attempts to then generate a manufactured public consensus.

With the formation and development of a public consensus or opinion, government and friends aka “local and world media” can then destroy the person, thing or subject with public support however seduced or misguided their beliefs.

Public opinion is used to gauge support for protection of Public interests when legal cases are brought before the courts or the public at large, if the judge finds that it is in the best interest of the Public that they carry out what ever decision in favor of public Interest [or public-private corporation investment perception] are acting out what is known as protectionism by omission of information or cases brought before the court that may disrupt public perception and investment potential/capital., which also at time limits the remedy for the parties of interest.

So in fact the court is protecting the corporation as it represents the public and its interest, and this is called Preventative Justice and it amounts to tax evasion by preventing justice and awards to protect of is own interests, opinion and bankroll.

Does this Sound Fair? Does this look clean? Do your hands need Washing?

I like to point out a few basic tenets of the queens ecclesiastical law, this is a reminder of the laws of the Canadian people and their Sovereign as defender of the faith, as I assert and defend my own, and correct the public opinion of Corporate–IN-Justice.

“You shall not steal.” Exodus 20:15

“If a man causes a field or vineyard to be grazed over, or lets his beast loose and it feeds in another man’s field, he shall make restitution from the best in his own field and in his own vineyard.” -Exodus 22:5

“Clearly no one is justified before God by the law, because, ‘The righteous will by faith.’ The law is not based on faith; on the contrary,…” –Galations 3:11.12

“We know that the law is good if one uses it properly. We also know that the law is not made for the righteous but for lawbreakers and rebels, the ungodly and sinful, the unholy and irreligious; for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers, for adulterers and perverts, for slave traders and liars and perjurers– and for whatever else is contrary to the sound doctrine that conforms to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, which he entrusted to me.” –I Timothy 1:8–11

“There is only one Lawgiver and Judge, the one who is able to save and destroy.” James 4:12  “Do not add to what I [the LORD] command you and do not subtract from it, but keep the commands of the Lord your God that I give you.” –Duet. 4:2

“Woe to those who make unjust laws, to those who issue oppressive decrees, to deprive the poor of their rights and withhold justice from the oppressed of my people, making widows their prey and robbing the fatherless.” –Isaiah 10:1, 2

Below is a sample letter:

sent to the brantfordexpostior indicating the characterization that diminishes the value of our persons, things and subjects, and whether they will acknowledge it or not is an act of Genocide and/or Politicide.

Hello and Greeting on this day of Friday March 25th 2011,

I have read a few of the expositors articles regarding the onkwehonwe “six nations peoples” and have concern of the use of the word you choose to continuously define the associated families “clans” and/or private members or to characterize the associated families or private members as so called FACTIONS please provide me with your Definition and your Editorial Interpretation of the selected word [FACTIONS].

If you can not provide me with your understanding of the word; FACTIONS, I will honorably ask that you choose a word you understand and can provide the definition for, the continual misuse of the word FACTIONS may imply that you are in-fact making a legal determination about the private members and families associated and linked with the organization of the needs of our community at whole or in part, and may pose a threat to the six nations general liberties.

My understanding of the word FACTIONS may imply:

1) party strife and intrigue; dissension: an era of faction and treason.
2) a form of writing or filmmaking that treats real people or events as if they were fictional or uses them as an integral part of a fictional account.
3) literary work comprising a dramatized presentation of actual events

What I believe you mean by attempting to redefine our families/clans/unit/posse as a whole or in part, you may find that the words “Families and Private Members”, would have a greater reflection of our people and may help correct any legal implications or determinations on your part.

Thank you for your time and consideration, I will be forwarding this message, and await your kind response, if you choose not to reply I will be under the belief and understanding that you are in agreement with my understanding and definition of the word FACTIONS as provided above. [1–3]

http://www.genocidewatch.org/aboutgenocide/8stagesofgenocide.html