web statistics
Repository - Benjamin Doolittle

Repository


QRCODE Title Dated
Archive Thumb
For all my Haudenosaunee brethren who are gearing up to celebrate the “two-row” agreement. This is an old letter by the Six Nations Clan Mothers invoking the principles of the “two-row” as well as the “Covenant Chain” belt to the King in 1917.
March 3, 2013
Archive Thumb
The secretary at war reports, that it may be a subject worthy the attention of Congress, whether it would not be necessary to appoint some confidential person, with a small salary, either resident with the Six Nations, or upon the frontiers nearest to them, to whom they might apply, as the intermediate person between them and Congress.
November 15, 2012
Archive Thumb
We have undertaken a king and tedious Voyage, which none of our Predecessors could ever be prevail’d upon to undertake
November 15, 2012
Archive Thumb
This broadside contains the text of the poem Four Indian Kings. The theme of the poem is the visit of four New York Indian chiefs to England in 1710.
November 14, 2012
Archive Thumb
The lacrosse game is a Feast given to Clear the Minds. Sometimes we are distracted and hold hard feelings, which makes us forget how much we depend on each other.
November 12, 2012
Archive Thumb
The birth of man is an act of nature. Nature has produced several races of mankind. They all have the right to live. No one has the right to take another person’s life, only in self defence.
November 12, 2012

To watch all 20 videos, uninterrupted, click here. The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is ruled by CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM or SECOND LAW OF THE LAND. CANADA is a DEFACTO GOVERNMENT or CORPORATION and is registered with the US Securities Exchange Commission under the requirements of the securities Act of 1934 as a subsidiary of the UNITED STATES as a business trading on the stock markets of the world as such. This is Canada’s Corporate registered number: 0000230098 CANADA DC SIC: 8880 American Depositary Receipt. … and Business Address: Canadian Embassy 1746 Massachusetts Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20036. CANADA goes by CROWN LAW which is the LAW of the CROWN OF ENGLAND. GOVERNMENTS are– owned by corporations, run by psychopaths, lying about an imaginary economy based on debt, fueled by illegal wars, destroying ecosystems, poisoning food & water, decreasing education, increasing prisons, manipulating the media, foreclosing homes, starving, humiliating, and killing the world; yet you still stay silent, pay taxes, vote, and trust the government? — Humberto Braga Let’s start with how the government works, or more specifically, how it is set up. Each town, city, county, state and province has an individual government with individual budgets and finance books. City councils who sit in fancy pillared or droll state buildings usually govern those many individual governments. Also, there are local government bodies, such as school districts and municipalities like gas, electric, water and sewage, bridges and roadways, and so on who are individually governed bodies as well. And then there are other forms of special government wealth, like pension funds. On a larger scale, there is the federal government, the judicial and congressional [united states] or municipal [canada]  governments and so on down the line. Together, these many individual governments are going to be referred to herein as “collective government”. Just as ethnic groups in this country are individually considered minority [also minority governments] populations with insignificant political and decision making power when compared to the Caucasian or “white” ethnic group, these individual governments are, when compared to the collective power of all of these governments joined together, insignificant. The power of these individual ethnic groups can only be realized if they ban together to become the majority. Likewise, the thousands of individual governments in the United States and Canada are extremely powerful and wealthy when manifested as one “collective” governmental body – collective government. Bearing this in mind, I will now reveal the man behind the..
November 2, 2012

Extracts from a speech given by Gerry Gambill at a conference on Human Rights at Tobique Reserve in New Brunswick, in August, 1958. In this speech he warned native people about how society goes about taking away the Human Rights of native people. It is ironic that Indians, whose ideas about human rights through the centuries have been so advanced; should be the group in Canada whose human rights have been so consistently denied. Any group which had as much practice as the white society in denying Indian human rights must be pretty good at it by now. The art of denying Indians their human rights has been refined to a science, and a whole society has become so skilled at it that it happens unconsciously and easily, like tying your shoes. The following list of commonly used techniques will be helpful in “burglar-proofing”  your reserves, and your rights.This list is only partial. complete it with your own information. GAIN THE INDIANS CO-OPERATION. It is easier to steal someone’s human rights  if you can do it with his OWN co-operation. 1. Make him a non-person. Human rights are for people. Convince Indians their ancestors were savages, that they were pagan, that Indians were drunkards. Make them wards of the government. Make a legal distinction, as in the Indian Act, between Indians and persons. Write history books that tell half the story. 2. Convince the Indian that he should be patient, that these things take time. Tell him that we are making progress, and that progress takes time 3. Make him believe that things are being done for his own good. Tell him you’re sure that after he has experienced your laws and actions that he will realize how good they have been. Tell the Indian he has to take a little of the bad in order to enjoy the benefits you are conferring on him. 4. Get some people to do the dirty work. There are always those who will act for you to the disadvantage of their own people. Just give them a little honor and praise. This is generally the function of band council, chiefs, and advisory councils: they have little legal power, but can handle the tough decisions such as welfare, allocation of housing etc. 5. Consult the Indian, but do not act on the basis of what you hear. Tell the Indian he has a voice and go through the motions of listening. Then interpret what you have heard to..
November 1, 2012

Canada is created on lies, deceit, theft and the fact alleged Canadian’s DO believe in the impossible.  This is an essay detailing “The Truth about Non-Canada!” or, if you prefer  you could say it reveals,“The Myth of Canada!“, Or it could be the story of “Canada: the Non-Country!” When we refer to our cur­rent alleged Cana­dian gov­ern­ment as de jure, we no doubt mean de facto, since de facto means “in fact”, but not “by law”, which is what de jure means. In other words, a law­ful gov­ern­ment is a de jure government. A gov­ern­ment that exists by decep­tion and fraud, and not by law­ful author­ity, is a de facto government. It’s highly unlikely that the Cana­dian estab­lish­ment, with polit­i­cal mil­lion­aire shys­ters as its van­guard, is igno­rant of the actual his­tory of Canada and its fake gov­ern­ment. The fake ver­sion taught in our schools has noth­ing in com­mon with 135 years of real­ity; of gov­ern­ment by mil­lion­aires, of mil­lion­aires, for millionaires. Canada is nei­ther a fed­er­a­tion nor does its gov­ern­ment oper­ate with legit­i­mate author­ity. Know­ing this and keep­ing mum about it makes politi­cians and the entire Bar Asso­ci­a­tion crim­i­nal offend­ers by default, if not by design…all of them, past and present. Which doesn’t mat­ter much these days because it’s obvi­ously cool (and very prof­itable) to be law­less, as far as those at the trough are concerned. Judg­ing by politi­cians, and the legal community’s vis­i­ble con­duct, their strat­egy seems to be one of per­pet­u­ally rein­forc­ing the nix­ing of the UNAUTHORIZED AND ILLEGITIMATE EXISTENCE OF CANADIAN GOVERNMENTS by teaching and cel­e­brat­ing a Cana­di­ana, pick­led in bald-faced lies, with much ado and hoopla. It takes a lot of time and effort to sep­a­rate the facts from the myths about Canada’s “cre­ation.” For­tu­nately, there have been many ded­i­cated Cana­di­ans doing the ardu­ous research. By learn­ing how con­sti­tu­tions and nations are prop­erly cre­ated and then com­par­ing this with Canada’s (and Britain’s) records of the time (and since then), these researchers have accu­rately re-created a chronol­ogy of what actu­ally hap­pened since 1864 and what Canada’s sta­tus is today…which isn’t news, it’s just infor­ma­tion that is rig­or­ously suppressed. Few peo­ple would sus­pect that edu­ca­tional fac­ul­ties, politi­cians, judges, media and the entire mem­ber­ship of the Cana­dian Bar Asso­ci­a­tion would inten­tion­ally deny the exis­tence of such a fun­da­men­tally impor­tant mat­ter. With few notable excep­tions, the pub­lic has unques­tion­ingly accepted the offi­cial fairy­tale as gospel. Pro­fes­sion­als, privy to the truth, are sim­ply too busy chas­ing the buck and drop the..
November 1, 2012

Originally Posted on October 16, 2010 NOTICE: Declaration of Unincorporation by Deregistration, Non-registration, and, Revocation of consent to be governed Respondent[s]: THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BRANTFORD, et al., All Principals and Agents, and, general public et al., Hereinafter collectively referred to as “RESPONDENT”, “you”, “your”, in all your capacities, Notice to principal is notice to agent, notice to agent is notice to principal GREETINGS, to all whom it may concern, do by these Presents send greeting: Take notice that the undersigned, Hereinafter Individually referred to as “We”, “our”, are considered to be [un]incorporated by deregistration, non-registration and revocation of consent to be governed. We hereby serve notice that your services or lack thereof are no longer desired or required Take heed, It is our understanding that registered voters are volunteering their consent and assent to be represented, and that the silent majority have become represented through assumption of tacit compliance, this notice serves as, Reservation of Rights of the un-incorporated silent majority, including Multiple John Doe, unincorporated. This revocation serves as record of non-compliance and rejection of tact assent to be represented by the RESPONDENT[s] W]e Demand, that you deregister any and all name[s] provided below, and, that you cease and desist from any further use of the names provided below for gain and/or control, and, that you release any assumptive, and colorable title[s] over the name[s] and properties of the named, and, that you provide a rebuttal with proof of claims that you have the authority to refuse our claims, positions and demands, and, that you provide your response under full commercial liability, under penalty of perjury within 72 hours from receipt of this notice, an additional 24 hours grace will be granted, should your response not be met within the [ID]entified 72 hour period, failure to respond to this notice within the 96 hours will be deemed to be your tacit assent, and, that you have been given due process to refute and rebut the set forth claims and demands, and, that your failure to provide proof of your claims to administrate, regulate, contravent our private contract[s] will be deemed, interlopers and seen as a transgression and misrepresentation of our whole and complete inalienable rights Take heart, this declaration functions in spirit as a living document. Take hold, We do not consent to, and waive, any and all benefit[s] of the RESPONDENT[s] et al., in absents of full..
November 1, 2012

Joseph Brant and the Invention of a Canadian Tradition by James Paxton, Queen’s University Presented at the Iroquois Research Conference on October 6, 2002. The American Revolution smashed the Iroquois Confederacy and dispersed the remnant over several communities in Upper Canada and New York. While historians have profitably studied different aspects of the New York Iroquois in the postwar era, the Six Nations of Ontario have attracted relatively little attention. Canadian scholars usually interpret them as loyalists rather than Iroquois. By casting the Six Nations of Upper Canada as loyalists, scholars assume the Iroquois acted out of the same sense of duty that compelled Euroamerican loyalists to reject the revolution. Although durable, this interpretation masks the cultural roots of their motivations and behaviour and subsumes native independence under a rubric of loyalty that the Iroquois themselves resolutely rejected. The myth of Iroquois loyalty is intimately tied to the person of Joseph Brant, the enigmatic Mohawk chief who left an ambiguous legacy. Brant’s adoption of many European practices and his ability to navigate English and Mohawk societies fluently has puzzled historians and caused his major biographers to question his “Indianness.” Like Brant’s Euroamerican contemporaries, many historians have accepted the image that he projected in his public dealings with Crown officials as an accurate representation of Mohawk beliefs. Brant, however, acted in accordance with Mohawk customs and consistently strove to attain chiefly authority. Among the Iroquois, chiefs’ claims to power derived from the nature and extent of their alliances, which they built and maintained through kinship, marriage, their abilities as warriors and diplomats, and by redistributing goods to followers. Brant employed these indigenous methods to gain power but extended his alliances to include members of the colonial and imperial communities. Brant was no loyalist. He accommodated colonization by attempting to create a coherent world from the diversity of the Mohawk Valley that fitted Europeans and their practices into a worldview rooted in Mohawk culture and values. Brant’s rapid rise to prominence during the revolution rested, to a great extent, on a foundation laid during his youth. On the eve of the war, almost everyone in the Mohawk Valley would have agreed that Brant was a promising and ambitious young man, possessed of ability and good connections. In both colonial and Iroquois society status derived in no small measure from the quality of one’s relations. Brant obtained considerable influence from his relationship to his..
November 1, 2012

Source: The Constitution of the Five Nations or The Iroquois Book of the Great Law, by A. C. Parker, reprinted by Iroqrafts. Skennon:kowa “Great Peace” The Iroquois Constitution ( Kaianarakowa), Its speacial interest lies in the fact that it is an attempt of the Iroquois themesleves to explain their own civic and social system. This formed a definitive law, a rule of law, the law of the land!
November 1, 2012

I have been making corrections to any administrative omissions or errors, while dealing with the corporation of Brantford, they have routinely failed in honoring my request for proof of delegation of authority, below is a letter I received from Brantfords adjusters, and my reply, also below is a link to the referenced notice/affidavit and communications with the city. I have asked the city to proof that they have been delegated authority from my nation to represent me or any non-client or non-member, this includes any non-voting, non-registered people. They have faulted on responding to my affidavit, and now the city is frantically trying to minimize the damage done from its neglect, the city wants six nations to grant them the right to not hear my voice or process, I have my opinions on who claims to speak for me, but I will always demand proof I granted my power to anyone. The link below is proof that the city players are attempting to re-position the city to deflect any damage they have caused me and their shareholders. http://www.brantfordexpositor.ca/2012/03/29/council-gets-briefing-on-native-legalities http://www.brantfordexpositor.ca/2012/03/21/common-interests-may-drive-native-talks If I am right the city was wrong in seeking any sort of injunctions on our people it was constitutional vandalism, tyrannical in nature, and treason. The city and local jurisdiction would be proven to have been invalid and all judgments reversed with some sort of compensation for wrong doing, eg misapplication of Canada’s constitution, at the least all unjust enrichment from application of any judgement would be reversed, This is so huge this should make any persons head spin. This doesn’t even get into the crown/bank/city mortgage fraud on Indian lands.
November 1, 2012

To Elizabeth Mountbatten-Battenberg hereinafter “you”, “your”; the Private Woman acting as, Principal (PSEUDO –SOVEREIGN) for the British Commonwealth; d.b.a. ELIZABETH WNDSOR; the vassal, for the United Nations Assembly; as well as your successors, permitted assigns, heirs and estates, in your non-represented capacity, and, To David Johnston hereinafter “you”, “your”; the Private Man acting as, Principal (GOVERNOR GENERAL-COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF) for the [National] government of Canada; d.b.a. DAVID JOHNSTON; the vassal, for the British Monarchy; as well as your successors, permitted assigns, heirs and estates, in your non-represented capacity, and, To Stephen Harper hereinafter “you”, “your”; the Private Man acting as, Principal (PRIME MINISTER-CEO) for THE [Federal] CORPORATION OF THE CORPORATE CANADA; d.b.a. STEPHEN HARPER; the vassal, for the British Monarchy; as well as your successors, permitted assigns, heirs and estates, in your non-represented capacity, and, To William Elliot hereinafter “you”. “your”; the Private Man acting as, Principal (COMMISSIONER) for THE ROYAL CANADIAN MOUNTED POLICE; THE [Federal] NATIONAL POLICE SERVICES AND ASSOCIATION hereinafter “business”; d.b.a. WILLIAM ELLIOT; the vassal, for the British Monarchy; as well as your successors, permitted assigns, heirs and estates, in your non-represented capacity, and, To David Onley hereinafter “you”. “your”; the Private Man acting as, Principal (LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR) for the [Provincial] government of the Province of Ontario hereinafter “business”; d.b.a. DAVID ONLEY; the vassal, for the British Monarchy; as well as your successors, permitted assigns, heirs and estates, in your non-represented capacity, and, To Dalton Mcguinty hereinafter “you”. “your”; the Private Man acting as, Principal (PREMIER-CEO) for THE CORPORATION OF THE [Provincial] GOVERNMENT OF THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO hereinafter “business”; d.b.a. DALTON MCGUINTY; the vassal, for the British Monarchy; as well as your successors, permitted assigns, heirs and estates, in your non-represented capacity, and, To Chris Friel hereinafter “you”, “your”; the Private Man acting as, Principal (MAYOR-CEO) for THE CORPORATION OF THE [Municipal] CITY OF BRANTFORD hereinafter “business”; d.b.a. CHRIS FRIEL; the vassal, for the British Monarchy; as well as your successors, permitted assigns, heirs and estates, in your non-represented capacity, and, To Ted Salisbury hereinafter “you”, “your”; the Private Man acting as, Principal (GENERAL MANAGER-CAO) for THE CORPORATION OF THE [Municipal] CITY OF BRANTFORD hereinafter “business”; d.b.a. TED SALISBURY; the vassal, for the British Monarchy; as well as your successors, permitted assigns, heirs and estates, in your non-represented capacity, and, To William Montour hereinafter “you”, “your”; the Private Man acting as, Principal (CHIEF COUNCILLOR-CEO) for THE CORPORATION OF THE [Municipal] SIX NATIONS OF THE GRAND RIVER;..
November 1, 2012

— Not long ago, a state’s Supreme Court wrote that a “rule forbidding resistance to an arrest when police officers act in good faith and under color of their authority … recognize[s] that in a society governed by laws our courts are the proper forum for challenges to the misuse of official power and for the vindication of rights.” But it wasn’t the Supreme Court of Indiana in Barnes v. Indiana, the case that’s gotten so much press these last two weeks. It was the Supreme Court of New Jersey, and it was five years ago. You wouldn’t know it to judge from the media coverage, but Barnes was neither unprecedented nor particularly remarkable. To the contrary, many courts and commentators refer to the “submit and litigate later” model as the “modern” view, because between 1962 and 2007, all but 12 states followed the model penal code in doing away with the right to resist. So far, as arrests outside the home are concerned, Indiana joined them in 1978, when Fields v. Indiana observed that the right “is outmoded in our modern society. A citizen, today, can seek his remedy for a policeman’s unwarranted and illegal intrusion into the citizen’s private affairs by bringing a civil action in the courts against the police officer and the governmental unit which the officer represents.” To understand the exodus from the common law rule, it helps to understand why courts developed a right to resist illegal arrest in the first place. In 1710, when Queen v. Tooley established the right, there were good reasons to fear mistaken or illegal arrest. Arrests were often made by regular citizens rather than well-trained and regulated police, and prisoners were held for long periods (no court-appointed counsel in those days, and courts weren’t permanently open for business as they are today) in physically wretched conditions (stuffed into overfull, poorly lit, filthy rooms, often in irons, with little food and no medical care). Inevitably, these prisons — dungeons, really — were routinely devastated by virulent outbreaks of typhus, to the point that it was estimated in 1759 that a quarter of the prisoners died each year. Thus, Prof. Sam Bass Warner notes: “Under such conditions, imprisonment until the next term of court was often equivalent to a death sentence.” These days, a night in the cell is doubtless an unpleasant experience, but the costs of mistaken arrest are lower, the speed..
November 1, 2012

Originally Posted on August 14, 2011 Chris Friel “principal” for the Corporation of the City of Brantford, Jeffery Kellner “principal” for the Corporate Brantford Police Services, William Montour “principal” for the Corporate Six Nations Elected Band Council, Glen Lickers “principal” for the Corporate Six Nations Police Service, collectively referred to as “you”, “your” She:kon // Greetings, I, the Honorable; Sovereign:-Benjamin-Douglas-Allan: of the Doolitlles’, as Embassador-at-Large for the Kanienkehaka Nation, Do Hereby, make REQUEST for Inspection of PROOF of DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY from the Kanienkehaka Nation. If obligation/command/order is made of our people by your people, companies and/or organizations, the burden of proof is on he who makes that assertion/claim. Do you hold Real-Proof of delegation of authority from the Kanienkehaka Nation? [[Hypothetically: You can delegate authority to a plumber to fix your pipes because you own the pipes and thus have the ultimate right to do with them as you please. A plumber who works on your pipes without your approval is called a Good Samaritan…or a vandal. A plumber who works on your pipes after you have authorized him to do so is called an agent]] If you continue to make the determination that you have the authority to make determination on behalf of the Kanienkehaka members without proof of delegation of authority, It can only be seen as VANDALISM and Trespass against the Kanienkehaka Constitution its members and/or way of life and quality of the life of its members. I pray that, you take the time to address and consider this matter as a serious flaw in your authority as applied to the Kanienkehaka Nation, or to correct this matter with real-evidence for proof of delegation of authority from the Kanienkehaka Nation to make determination on behalf of its members, so that the Kaninkehaka Members may properly inspect then ascertain their obligation if any. Since time is of the essence we require a prompt response to our concerns and full disclosure of any obligatory contracts. Within two weeks from receipt of this demand should be sufficient time for you to retrieve any instrument of indebtedness through delegation of authority from the Kanienkehaka Nation, if you require more time; you must request an extension within reason. Silence can only equate with guilt where there is a legal and moral duty to respond. With peace, strength and righteousness Kanienkehaka Embassador-at-Large Benjamin-Douglas-Allan: of the Doolittles’
November 1, 2012

The Hudson’s Bay Company’s 300th anniversary celebration was no occasion for joy among the people whose lives were tied to the trading stores. This film, narrated by George Manuel, president of the National Indian Brotherhood, presents the view of spokesmen for Canadian Indian and Métis groups. There is a sharp contrast between the official celebrations, with Queen Elizabeth II among the guests, and what Indians have to say about their lot in the Company’s operations.
November 1, 2012

In recent weeks a few members of the six nations failed in an appeals process to have an injunction overturned. To paint a vague background, the city of Brantford sold some land within lands under six nation interests, and when the builder started his project the people from six nations asserted their interests, preventing the builder from moving forward the builder launched a lawsuit against the city for not disclosing prior interest on the land, the city provided limited information that may have been overlooked or insufficient. Leading to this statement and injunction by Harrison Arrells’ “I find it as a fact …For more than 150 years, the Six Nations did nothing to indicate to innocent third-party purchasers that there was any problem with title to their lands”, “the economy of this small city is at risk; the employment of members of the community are likewise at risk; the reputation of the city as a place to live, work and invest is at risk; all as a result of the city being unable to regulate development, provide a conflict-free environment for investment, employment and the raising of families, and the inability of the city to ensure to local a residents and the investment community that the rule of law prevails.” Now here is where I make my case that the collective governments use the courts to not only redirect the actual cause of the risk but to uphold its duty to rescue as a tool to protect itself from nothing less than total collapse of the real estate and Canadian land claims industry. Hereabout in Arrells statement he points out that six nations did nothing to indicate to innocent third-party purchasers that there was any problem with title to their lands. Lets look at the list of so-called third-party purchaser  (this list may not be complete but it does not need be to prove my point): The Corporation of the City of Brantford Everyone else, with some exceptions Now that I have you wondering how is Brantford a third party, The corporation of the City of Brantford is not a crown corporation, why is this significant? because only the real parties of interest (British Crown vs. American Indians) have a stake in the outcome of any final resolution. Until a resolution only first parties must presume to have 50% controlling and or active interests, unless a superior claim comes to the table. Contrary to Arrells statement that “six nations so-called claim is weak” the six nations have at least 50% position in the outcome, so that is a false statement and misleading..
November 1, 2012

Wampum, ke‘kwuk, squau-tho-won; all are Algonquian words for shell beads or string of shell beads. Wampumpeage is a Narragansett word for “white beads strung”. Throughout northeastern America, wampum was used for jewelry, gifts, communication, historical record of important events, religious ceremonies, and trade. It was the earliest form of currency known in North America. Its value was derived from the difficulty involved in producing the cylindrical bead from both Quahog and Whelk, and the scarcity of suitable shells. White beads were made from Whelk, purple-blackish from Quahog. The beads were produced from the inner spiral of the shells. The spiral or columna must be thick enough to withstand grinding, shaping and drilling. The shells were collected along the coastal shores during the summer, and worked in the winter months. The inner spirals were cut into cylinders measuring 1/4 inch long by 1/8 inch diameter. Each bead was then smoothed through grinding, polished, drilled, and finally strung on hemp fibers or sinew. It was difficult, tedious, and time consuming work. The proportionate scarcity of the Quahog dark beads doubled their value to that of white wampum. Though wampum is most often associated with the Iroquois, and there are claims that the Iroquois were the first producers of wampum beads, it is more likely that the Iroquois were introduced to wampum by trade. The Iroquois lived in the interior, whereas sea shells could be found only in the coastal regions. The Narragansetts were most probably the first producers of wampum, with other coastal Algonquians, including the Delaware, following shortly thereafter. Wampum was a firmly established base of currency by the time of increased European colonial settlements in the 17th century. Though it did have a monetary value, its sole purpose for the colonials, it was by no means limited to an economic role. As stated above, wampum was used for a multitude of purposes, not least of which was the binding truth to words “written” in wampum. So respected and important was it that an accompanying belt of wampum gave great solemnity to messages, speeches, and agreements. A message delivered via a wampum belt is said to have been greater than a thousand words, and it was accepted as truth. It was the seal, the proof of covenants made. The oldest extant wampum belt is the Huron belt given to the Jesuits to commemorate the first mission house built in Huronia. Offered..
November 1, 2012

“Where License Reigns With All Impunity” An Anarchist Study of the Rotinonshón:ni Polity The traditional society of the Rotinonshón:ni (Iroquois), “The People of the Longhouse,” was a densely settled, matrilineal, communal, and extensively horticultural society. The Rotinonshón:ni formed a confederacy of five nations. Generations before historical contact with Europeans, these nations united through the Kaianere’kó:wa into the same polity and ended blood feuding without economic exploitation, stratification, or the formation of a centralized state. Introduction How Peace Came to the Rotinonshón:ni “One Bowl”: The Communal Economy of the Rotinonshón:ni “We are left to answer for our women” The Beaver Wars, which were Not Only about the Fur Trade Kaianere’kó:wa as Constitution of a Stateless Polity? Anarcho-Indigenism Bibliography Glossary: Concepts,  Nations, People, Places End Notes by Stephen Arthur “Their Policy in this is very wise, and has nothing Barbarous in it. For, since their preservation depends upon their union, and since it is hardly possible that among peoples where license reigns with all impunity — and, above all, among young people — there should not happen some event capable of causing a rupture, and disuniting their minds, — for these reasons, they hold every year a general assembly in Onnontaé. There all the Deputies from the different Nations are present, to make their complaints and receive the necessary satisfaction in mutual gifts, — by means of which they maintain a good understanding with one another.“ François le Mercier, 1668 (1) Some historical materialists claim a densely settled, agricultural population will inevitably develop into a hierarchically stratified society, with a centralized state and an exploitative economic redistribution system, in order avoid warfare while resolving blood feuds among its members.(2) While this is a common occurence, it is not the only way these issues have been resolved. Located along the southern banks of Kaniatarí:io (Lake Ontario), the traditional society of the Rotinonshón:ni (Iroquois),(3) “The People of the Longhouse,” was a densely settled, matrilineal, communal, and extensively horticultural society. The Rotinonshón:ni formed a confederacy initially of five nations: Kanien’kehá:ka (Mohawk), Oneniote’á:ka (Onedia), Ononta’kehá:ka (Onondaga), Kaion’kehá:ka (Cayuga) and Shotinontowane’á:ka (Seneca). Generations before historical contact with Europeans,(4) these nations united through the Kaianere’kó:wa (“the Great Good Way”) into the same polity(5) and ended blood feuding without economic exploitation, stratification, or the formation of a centralized state. Jared Diamond hypothesizes that when stateless egalitarian hunter-gather societies develop agriculture and experience population growth, blood feuds and new resource management problems challenge their ability..
November 1, 2012

I see quite often the subject of water fluoridation considered a conspiracy theory. Yet every time I search for this subject I get some very credible links and info that I find very hard to dismiss. One of the more important facts that jumps out to me is that most of the developed world doesn’t fluoridate their water and has no difference in tooth decay compared to countries that do. The question that I will ask here is if fluoride has no effect on tooth decay when taken internally through water, why are we being forced to ingest a poison? And yes it is a poison called “disodium hexa-fluorosilicate S7″, in fact a by-product of aluminum production that the industry can’t seem to get rid of except to sell it to put into our water. A not so well known fact is that if you swallow more than a pea sized bit of toothpaste, the warning on the tube states that you should immediately seek medical attention, yet a glass of water has about the same amount of fluoride in it. We MUST STOP the addition of disodium hexafluorosilicate going into our city water supplies. It is a poison. PLEASE STOP CALLING THIS STUFF FLUORIDE – IT IS DISODIUM Hexafluorosilicate S7 poison used as rat poison, pesticides, insecticide, weevil and termite bait, used in wood preservative, a moth repellent!, and most shockingly PROZAC is 95% made of this de facto drug. Prozac is a fluorinated drug called “fluoxetine”. Paxil is a fluorinated drug called “paroxetine” (also called Seroxat, Aropax). These drugs are designed to inhibit the reuptake of serotonin (serotonin reuptake inhibitors – SSRIs) and hence interfere with the biological actions of serotonin, a neurotransmitter. Both drugs contain fluorine and chloride. Fluoride is present as a ’4-fluorophenyl‘ compound, part of the ‘active’ ingredient. Fluorophenyl compounds have shown to disturb thyroid hormone activity in several ways, specifically in the liver and at the hypothalamus-pituitary-thyroid (HPT) axis. Serotonin Deficiency In humans, defective signalling of serotonin in the brain may be the root cause of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). Scientists from the European Molecular Biology Laboratory in Monterotondo, Italy genetically modified lab mice to produce low levels of the neurotransmitter serotonin. The results showed the mice suffered drops in heart rate and other symptoms of SIDS, and many of the animals died at an early age. Researchers now believe low levels of serotonin in the animals’ brainstems, which control heartbeat and..
October 28, 2012

A warrior lives by acting, not by thinking about acting, nor by thinking about what he will think when he has finished acting. Whenever a warrior decides to do something, he must go all the way. But, he must take responsibility for what he does. No matter what he does, he must know first why he is doing it, and then he must proceed with his actions without having doubts or remorse about them. A warrior takes responsibility for his acts; for the most trivial of his acts. An average man acts out his thoughts and never takes responsibility for what he does. There is no emptiness in the life of a warrior. Everything is filled to the brim. Everything is filled to the brim and everything is equal. A warrior goes to knowledge as he goes to war; wide-awake, with fear, with respect, and with absolute-assurance. Going to knowledge or going to war in any other manner is a mistake, and whoever makes it might never live to regret it. —- When a man has fulfilled all four of these requisites – to be awake, to have fear, respect, and absolute-assurance – there are no mistakes for which he will have to account, under such conditions his actions lose the blundering quality of the acts of a fool. If such a man fails, or suffers defeat, he will have only lost a battle, and there will be no pitiful regrets over that. Dwelling upon the self too much produces a terrible fatigue. A man in that position is deaf and blind to everything else. The fatigue, itself, makes him cease to see the marvels all around him. To be angry at people means that one considers their acts to be (too) important. It is imperative to cease to feel that way. The acts of men cannot be important enough to offset our only viable alternative: our unchangeable encounter with infinity. The things that people do cannot, under any conditions, be more important than what they are or more important than the world. And thus, a warrior treats the world and people as an endless mystery; and what people do as an endless folly. Anything is one of a million paths. Therefore, a warrior must always keep in mind that a path is only a path; if he feels that he should not follow it, he must not stay with..
October 28, 2012

If there is any representative of any department of government, Canadian or American, who can provide proof that there is any information offered on this website which is incorrect, erroneous or illegal, then please feel free to inform the webmaster, and it will be promptly corrected or removed from this internet website. The primary assertions made on this website are: 1. The income tax applies only to fictional entities called persons and/or citizen. 2. There is absolutely no government act, statute or law to which any free will human in Canada, or in the USA, is subject. 3. A free will human can enter into a contract of servitude with the de facto Government of Canada, or with a Province, or with the de facto Crown in right to either of the above, or with a State[USA], only voluntarily and only with full and open knowledge of their change of status to that of plantation slave. But, that is not how the Government has imposed the slave status upon you. Read my Name Game Blog. 4. The fraudulent tricking of people, through their ignorance, into the status of “plantation slave” by their using a name created and owned by the Crown or State is an act of treason, by government, upon the sovereign people. That Crown or State owned name is the Birth certificate name. 5. Since we, as free will beings, are REQUIRED to use the Crown/State owned legal identity name in all commerce and in government communication, such use is not a voluntary act on our part, as we must use it by PRIVATE NECESSITY to sustain and maintain our life. That negates the Crown/State claim that we voluntarily use it, and thus negates our becoming property owned by the Crown/State through the legal maxim, accessio cedit principali. 6. The ‘legal fiction name’, AKA: ‘person/taxpayer’, has only the function of an ‘agent in commerce’ and ‘trustee in trust’ for the free will adult human to which it is associated. And for Canada specifically: 7. The British Monarchy ceased to have any relevance to Canada in 1901, upon the death of Queen Victoria. All British Monarchs have been pretender Monarchs of Canada since that date. The office of ‘The Queen’, ‘Her Majesty’ or ‘the Crown’ is the ‘also known as’ name for the City of London, and its owner, the Vatican, as the Monarchy of England have been vassal..
October 28, 2012

Because I write about politics, people are asking me the best way to teach children how our system of government works. I tell them that they can give their own children a basic civics course right in their own homes. In my own experience as a father, I have discovered several simple devices that can illustrate to a child’s mind the principles on which the modern state deals with its citizens. You may find them helpful, too. For example, I used to play the simple card game WAR with my son. After a while, when he thoroughly understood that the higher ranking cards beat the lower ranking ones, I created a new game I called GOVERNMENT. In this game, I was Government, and I won every trick, regardless of who had the better card. My boy soon lost interest in my new game, but I like to think it taught him a valuable lesson for later in life. When your child is a little older, you can teach him about our tax system in a way that is easy to grasp. Offer him, say, $10 to mow the lawn. When he has mowed it and asks to be paid, withhold $5 and explain that this is income tax. Give $1 to his younger brother, and tell him that this is “fair”. Also, explain that you need the other $4 yourself to cover the administrative costs of dividing the money. When he cries, tell him he is being “selfish” and “greedy”. Later in life he will thank you. Make as many rules as possible. Leave the reasons for them obscure. Enforce them arbitrarily. Accuse your child of breaking rules you have never told him about. Keep him anxious that he may be violating commands you haven’t yet issued. Instill in him the feeling that rules are utterly irrational. This will prepare him for living under democratic government. When your child has matured sufficiently to understand how the judicial system works, set a bedtime for him and then send him to bed an hour early. When he tearfully accuses you of breaking the rules, explain that you made the rules and you can interpret them in any way that seems appropriate to you, according to changing conditions. This will prepare him for the Supreme Court’s concept of the U.S. Constitution as a “living document”. Promise often to take him to the movies..
October 28, 2012
Archive Thumb
October 28, 2012

The United States is often described as an experiment in self-government. But what is this thing? Most people understand “self-government” to mean democracy. According to this understanding, a people are self-governed if they regularly vote to select the individuals who are to occupy political offices. This method of deciding who holds political power has clear advantages over conferring political power according to military prowess, bloodlines, or other criteria remote from the input of the ordinary men and women who are to be governed. “All societies of man must be governed in some way or other. The less they may have of stringent state government, the more they must have of individual self-government. The less they rely on public law or physical force, the more they must rely on private moral restraint. Man, in a word, must necessarily be controlled; either by a power within them, or by a power without them; either by the Word of God or by the strong arm of man.” John Quincy Adams Understood in this way, to endorse self-government is hardly to take a courageous or controversial stand. No good case can be made that fitness to govern is best determined by bloodline or by skill at military conquest. Clearly, whatever power the state exercises ought to be exercised by people chosen in fair elections by those who are subject to the state’s dictates. Almost no one in modern Western society disagrees that people ought to be governed in this way. But such government, regardless of its merits, is not really self-government. It is government by the elected. No amount of romantic praise of democracy can change the fact that even the best popularly elected government routinely obliges Smith—against his will—to do the bidding of Jones. And whether Jones be an influential special-interest group or a popular majority, when Smith is threatened with coercion to do Jones’s bidding, neither Smith nor Jones is self-governing. Smith is governed by Jones, and Jones is governing not only himself but Smith as well. True Self-Government Self-government in a truer, more literal sense is both desirable and possible. True self-government is just that: self–government. Each individual governs himself. Each person is free to chart his own life’s course, choosing which risks to brave and which to avoid. Each person is responsible only for himself, for his family, and for those whom he—of his own volition—chooses to care for. Each person has a..
October 28, 2012

What is a Mandate? A judicial or legal command from superior, political authority supposed to be given by electors to Members of Parliament. Independent Candidate Nomination Form would be a Mandate. Mandatory: Of; conveying; a command; compulsory. What is a Will? A WILL can be used in different ways, (1). Work one’s WILL: To do exactly what one wants. (2). Conjoin: To join together, to combine, to unite. (3). Conjoint, Joint, Will: a testamentary act by two persons jointly in the same Instrument. So to answer that; requires a short lesson as well as a definition of the term. Firstly a mandate by definition is literally an instruction; so it follows that by definition, a people’s mandate is an Instruction by the people and Command of the people.Do mandates work? The short answer is, yes they do. Will a mandate work elsewhere? Again the short answer is yes. For this you only have to look at what happened in Werribee and Mildura with the toxic waste dumps. So why is a mandate working whereas rallies and petitions do not? For a start there is a huge difference between a petition or rally etc. and a mandate. For you to understand why requires the short lesson. Under the requirements of the Canadian Constitution you are required to not only elect your representative but also to inform that representative of your Will in any and all matters. Your representative is likewise required to obey your Will in any and all matters. Some of you may be asking the question now why don’t the politicians therefore obey the people when they rally and present a petition? The reason that they don’t, is because they do not have to. This may sound like a contradiction but they don’t have to because, and this is the important bit, it is not your Will. “Your Will” is yours alone. When you sign a petition or attend a rally all you are doing is saying that you have no free will in that you are agreeing with someone else and therefore you and he or she can be ignored. To be your Will it must be freely given. So how do you do that? It is so incredibly simple it is not funny; all that is necessary is that you indicate your Will individually in writing with only your signature alone on it. Dead simple is it not..
October 28, 2012

As we approach the need to advance our recovery plans and remediation of infected lands, here are a few sound solutions to stimulate growth within the Recovery projects scheme. The team has put together some models for future use of the famed Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield. From the very start, sustainability has played a major role in the development of Pentortoise Projects from a social, ecological and economic viewpoint. The coöperative planning process, working closely together with local residents, environmental associations, heritage protection, tourism organisations and local and cantonal authorities, forms the solid basis for Pentortoise Projects. We have also opened the channels of communication with leaders in natural bio-remediation, which we consider innovative and with the wake of the gulf oil spill there has been abundant practice with much success. Our mission is to stay 100% away from chemical cleaners chemical soil washing. However this may be a slow process, but it would be the safest way to extract the heavy metals and oils by earthworms, mushroom cultures and fast growing vegetation to draw up the toxic remnants. Teams of researchers in Venezuela and Argentina are on the verge of elevating the lowly earthworm to rockstar status when it comes to cleaning up hazardous materials. They are studying the ability of earthworms to remediate soil containing lead, mercury, and other contaminants, and so far the worms seem to be getting the job done, by eating as much as 7–30 times their body mass in one day. Worms and Green Remediation Worms are basically a digestive system that can move about on its own, and humankind has long exploited their capacity for transforming organic matter into rich, nutrient-laden soil through the practice of vermiculture or more domesticly known as the computer. More recently, at least agricultural operations have begun to adopt vermiculture specifically to prevent piles of rotting food waste from contaminating nearby waterways. This comes close to green remediation, which is the use of alternative techniques to clean up contaminated soil or water, rather than digging out the site, capping it off, or treating it with harsh chemicals. Worms and Heavy Metals The new research takes it a step beyond, by using worms to clean up metals and other toxic chemicals. One team used worm-produced soil (vermicompost) to absorb contaminated waste-water that contained nickel, chromium, vanadium, and lead. The other team used a more direct method, setting the earthworms loose on..
October 28, 2012

The success rate across the province is amazing. It is directly related to our teamwork. It took a little time to deal with the issue of conscience in our community. Just like the presenters have told us that the more we engage in these activities the less effective our conscience. Fortunately, we have now raised a generation of youth with out a conscience. “They have no conscience! They have a mission!” It is wonderful to witness three (3) generations of the Council working hand in hand and without a conscience. Just think of the activities the next generation will engage in. Note: Although this article seems serious it is intended as dark humor, an attempt to remove the vial of secrecy and innocence within the fleeting network of councilship under the many hidden faces of social bodies and their priorities, we need to look with both eyes. Below are just a few of the focal areas where recruitment has proven successful and the trust of the target is great. Animal attendants – (walkers, sitters, etc. even a few vets) Maids – full access to the target’s home, family (need we say more) Teachers – It is easy to recruit the justifiably angry teachers from the 60’s and 70’s These teachers recruit the younger teachers and decree a false sense of entitlement to ensure their participation in the council. Those who do not participate generally will remain quiet when they realize our numbers and tactics. ( teachers generally recruit teachers) Property Managers are gems – Imagine one without character and no conscience. (see housing below) Warehouse and Retail Food Markets – Initially, these venues seemed challenging. Now we know and understand the power in our numbers-the power in recruitment. Once we have determined our target, their location, their shopping habits, favorite foods, etc.-there is no stopping us. Imagine this scenario: Target X buys steak every week from Stop & Shop, soda & juice from BJ’s, milk from the corner grocer, and the whole family enjoys eating at Dunkin Donuts on Saturday mornings at 9:30 am, the mother picks up a 24 package of juice every week and then meets her friends at Starbucks on Wednesday nights. Remember, “It’s all in the hands!” Well due to your recruitment efforts, we have several council members who work at each location. Need I say more? If we cannot handle the items in the store, we have “connections” at the warehouse level. That is the power of recruitment. The..
October 28, 2012

IN THE MATTER OF preventing the genocide caused by the obstruction and ignoring of the constitutional question of jurisdictional law alone of Indian tribal sovereignty asked and answered and invited into the Supreme Court of the United States by its Associate Justice Clarence Thomas in the case of United States v. Lara, 541 US 193 (2004). Case Objective To re-instate constitutional democracy under the rule of law for all purposes in order to serve the particular purpose of preventing the genocide that is being caused by the judicial branch’s recent obstructing and ignoring of its previously settled answer to the constitutional question of jurisdictional law alone of Indian tribal sovereignty pending treaty of relinquishment as required by the Constitution’s amendment, defense, treaty and original US Supreme Court jurisdiction clauses. MODUS OPERANDI OF THE GENOCIDE The case is in limbo because the US Supreme Court Clerk refuses to docket and deliver it to the US Supreme Court Judges to affirm the previously-settled answer to the constitutional question on the ground subsequently-enacted federal legislation blocks access to the Court. The Clerk prejudges the conflict of laws by blindsiding the constitution and applying the manifestly unconstitutional federal law. The constitution guarantees to the tribes the same access to the Court as foreign Nations whereas the federal legislation repeals tribal access which irrefutably is unconstitutional since the federal legislation clearly and plainly does not comply with the constitution’s amendment clause. www.mightisnotright.org
October 28, 2012

The State has always needed an opinion-molding class to convince the masses that the institution of government is necessary, proper, and vital in its organization and delivery of essential public services that could not otherwise be provided. In exchange for the creation and dissemination of such ideological propaganda, the apologist class receives certain benefits and privileges in return from the State. In the past, the alliance between Church and State typified this power-wielding relationship, with the priestly class using its religious influence to explain to the masses why the government was exempt from certain rules of conduct forbidden to everyone else. Taxation is not theft, and war is not murder: God says so. In modern society, religious institutions are no longer as influential as they were in the past, as science has widely displaced religion. Today, the scholarly experts, the intellectual class, receives the greatest respect from the masses. The old Church and State alliance has been replaced with the fusion of School and State. If the people respect and obey the intellectual class, then the government must control and ally itself with this indispensable public relations machine. So we should not be surprised to discover that the State has seized a monopoly on education in this country (as is the case in most countries). The school has replaced the church as the temple of mass indoctrination. Make the people believe in education, then educate them according to certain specifications, then watch them follow the lead of the expert intellectuals. Taxation is not theft, and war is not murder: Science says so. Now a popular counter to this argument is to point out that the United States has an extensive network of private universities that are independent of government and its influence. We produce a steady stream of government-independent intellectuals that can contribute to a free market of ideas in our society, contributions that are not necessarily what the State wishes to be broadcast. Funding The common assumption that private universities receive the bulk of their financing through endowments and other private means simply is not true. The examination of a typical private university financial report reveals that most receive a large percentage of their funding through public channels. Over 20 years ago, Murray Rothbard noted that: “… it is almost impossible to find a university that is not owned, economically if not legally, by the government. If one’s criterion of government ownership is the..
October 28, 2012

Lets take a look at the two words ”Information” and ”Intelligence”, I like to check wikipedia to get a common usage of the words then look in historical references,  wikipedia works for these purposes. Information in its most restricted technical sense is a message (utterance or expression) or collection of messages that consists of an ordered sequence of symbols, or it is the meaning that can be interpreted from such a message or collection of messages. Intelligence has been defined in different ways, including the abilities for abstract thought, understanding, communication, reasoning, learning, planning, emotional intelligence and problem solving. “Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns” (1995), a report published by the Board of Scientific Affairs of the American Psychological Association: “Individuals differ from one another in their ability to understand complex ideas, to adapt effectively to the environment, to learn from experience, to engage in various forms of reasoning, to overcome obstacles by taking thought. Although these individual differences can be substantial, they are never entirely consistent: a given person’s intellectual performance will vary on different occasions, in different domains, as judged by different criteria. Concepts of “intelligence” are attempts to clarify and organize this complex set of phenomena. Although considerable clarity has been achieved in some areas, no such conceptualization has yet answered all the important questions, and none commands universal assent. Indeed, when two dozen prominent theorists were recently asked to define intelligence, they gave two dozen, somewhat different, definitions.” By these definitions information is collected as raw data to be interpreted, intelligence is the reasoning of information as raw data. At the heart of the intelligence effort lies a paradox. Intelligence is valuable only if it can be shared with people who need it, but, to the extent that it is more widely shared, risks of compromise are enhanced, In this sense intelligence is of little or no value to people who have no need for it. When information is accepted as intelligence by people who need it, its use and function must be studied to develop a sense and understanding of its purpose. An individual may trust and use the information as “intelligence”, by not trusting the information, its perceived intelligence purposes are not accepted or identified as intel.Conveying information with reason helps the respondent trust the information allowing  personal rationalization and realization of the information, when information is accepted as rational and real,  info becomes intel.Its in the mind. spoken through the masks we wear.
October 28, 2012

What is a land claim and who makes a land claim? Land claims are a legal declaration of desired control over areas of property including bodies of water. The phrase is usually only used with respect to disputed or unresolved land claims. Some types of land claims include aboriginal (the term “aboriginal” is a creation of Canadian constitutional imposition, and oftentimes falsely applied, therefore most if not all claims from this office is relabeled and repackaged Canadian land claim) land claims, Antarctic land claims, and post-colonial land claims. This of course is a colonial concept of ownership propagated by the papal bulls of the Vatican, allowing Christians to stake claims on foreign lands and rid the lands of conflicting authorities. Romanus Pontifex, January 8, 1455 — …We bestow suitable favors and special graces on those Catholic kings and princes, …athletes and intrepid champions of the Christian faith… to invade, search out, capture, vanquish, and subdue all Saracens and pagans whatsoever, and other enemies of Christ wheresoever placed, and… to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery, and to apply and appropriate… possessions, and goods, and to convert them to… their use and profit The papal bull was a foreign claim on lands not within their realm, so this is the root of land claims of today and unlawful occupation on north america. Historically and pre-colonial the six nations as it where, knew and had a shared concept of territory and war, to encroach onto a territory meant to risk certain death, however through confederation of the six nations and territories, the end of land claims brought about the end of war. Sken:non kowa: In mohawk language this means “is there still the great peace”, an unaffirmable question and greeting meant as a reminder to the peace between the people of the league of nations. So this leads us into my main point that to make a land claim is the act of waging war against the people that live on the land  and all those who are outside of the claim. When six nations (53 nations)  buried the hatchet between the league of nations and uniting the territories they had ended war against themselves by not claiming lands, it is known that the people are the land, the people are the water, so they speak to it, about it and for it. From my legal studies, the crown or Vatican has made the land claims, Canada, the provinces, and municipalities make land claims,  all based on a fraudulent document from the pope, Since all foreign claims to this land are based on Indians defined as pagans or sub-human,  the claim..
October 28, 2012
Archive Thumb
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5L_x6RHE4s The Empire of the City consists of three cities, which belong to no nation or state and pay no taxes: Vatican City, the City of London (not London), and Washington DC. Vatican City controls the world through religion, the City of London controls the world through currency, and Washington DC controls the world through force. The City of London (or the Square Mile) is a plot of land approximately a square mile in London. It is independent from England and is ruled by the City of London Corporation. Located in the center of each city is an Egyptian obelisk erect. They are: the obelisk in St. Peter’s Square, the Washington Monument, and Cleopatra’s Needle in the City of London, which is a tribute to the Egyptian “pagan” sun god Amen-Ra, in the middle of Vatican City. Contained within these three cities is more than 80% of the world’s wealth. The Empire of “the City” is essentially the British Empire, or more accurately, the forces behind the British Empire of the past. The Empire asserts its control over its colonies (such as the US, Canada, Australia, the European Union) through complicated means. I hope this helps anyone that has been watching my updates, help by showing you how the Pope is our accepted brother through the Two Row Wampum with very limited powers here on turtle island, open your mind do not let our brother convince you the original people have perished, and they then lay seed and sow and reap our lands and families. There is no need to repudiate the Papal Bulls it was done by our grandfathers from the beginning here on Great Turtle Island. The Hodenashuanee where not the only nations to refute the Bulls and the popes agents carrying his offers. Hernando de Soto (Spanish conquistador), Invited Natche Cheif to visit with him saying that he too was the Sun of the Sun. Natche Paramount Cheif, Sun of the Sun, responded, “With respect to what you have said, being the sun of the sun, let him dry up the great river and I will believe him, with respect to the rest, I am not accustom to visit anyone, on the contrary all of whom I have knowledge visit and serve me, and obey me, and pay me tribute.” They never met., later pushing the conquistadores down the Mississippi river into mexico, however they left an ill man that wiped out many nations. Further Reading on the..
October 28, 2012
Archive Thumb
INTRODUCTION This article is intended to give the reader a fundamental understanding and basic guide to study the Conflicts of Law when asserting National Sovereignty through Private National Law, or using Domestic or Foreign Law to seek remedy when a Conflict of Law has occurred. FORWARD In this review we have listed many discussed terms and processes that are used to show the misapplication of law and firm line of separation of authority in the domestic/private/foreign rule of law, and fundamentals of each native constitution e.g. Canadian constitution vs Kanianke’haka “private Indian” constitution, our findings have shown that many paradoxes exist within the greater community at large when asserting diverse rule of law. However, since the spirit of the ever present Indian nations have never been extinguished or rightfully replaced, the private Indian continue to survive and harvest the abundance of the collective spirit and nature, asserting the founding and fundamental principals and way of the one dish, and the two row wampum; “perpetual reservation of rights, balance of all things”.The Indian nations are presumed under Canada’s constitution and corporate umbrella that dominates the local and domestic systems of finance and governance thus encroaching the private Indian right and pirating the nature of the host Indian nations breaching the peace and guest-friend relationship, for example the use of the 1969 “Trudeau/Chrétien” White Papers to coercively extend the Canadian citizenship onto the private Indian nations without delegation of authority from the private nations. In systematic efforts to silence and terminate the Indian born rights, Canada has developed specific courts, territorial injunctions, inclusive legislation and passages in the BNA act in effort to gain jurisdiction by mutual use of these exploitive elements built as a tool for conversion, though Indian nations have survived insurrections and treason, 1969 White Paper on Indians, 1924 raids of private council chambers, usurpation of the authentic councils of the Indian nations without delegation of authority or qualified representation. Non-Delegation of Authority It is this writers analysis that given the information referenced in this paper the Paramount question is: Where is the real evidence, a lawful delegation of authority order granting the “company/agent” authority to make any legal or lawful determination on behalf of “the people of the ___”/non-company-members? Was authority including lands assigned, granted, conveyed with proper records of this event, when a question is stated in the positive tense the private nation making the claim has..
January 9, 2012

The word “resident” is constructed from two Latin roots, “res” which translates into english as “thing” and “ident” which translates into english as “identified” (also side note on ”IDENTIFY: ID is an association and materialization of the mind.) This refers to the grouping ID, EGO and the Super ego Making up the MIND, now for the second part of the word, ENTIFY which means to actualize a thought or better yet a creation of an entity, So to ID-ENTIFY yourself is to present your mind in a recognizable way i.e. Drivers License, Status Card. This is an attempt to avoid your ego when dealing with you as a whole, essentially dividing your mind, stopping your collective consciousness from being fully involved or aware of your submissions by only addressing the PERSON-ality in one manner: 2Dimentional) So “resident” literally means a thing that has been identified. Are you such a thing? Your government says you are. What then does it mean to be a legal “resident” and “reside” in a State? Resident. One who has his residence in a permanent place. If you are statused as a “resident” you are subject to all kinds of civil code as a person or individual that does not apply to inhabitants who can still get the protection of the common law. For instance, in most states, a “nonresident” is exempt from any car tax imposition by local government UNLESS the nonresident is in commercial activity with the vehicle other than farm to market commerce. The term resident must be given its meaning and significance from the context in which it is used. Generally, the word ‘resident’ is one of common usage with numerous definitions to be found in judicial decisions. As stated in 77 C.J.S. Resident at p. 305–306, the word has no technical meaning, and no fixed meaning applicable to all cases, but rather it has many meanings, and is used in different and various senses, and it has received various interpretations by the courts. That text goes on to state that in order to constitute a person a resident of a particular state, he must intend to make, and actually make, that state his home, although he need not have determined to make it always his home. Thus a person becomes a resident of a state when he is personally present at some place of abode within the state, with no present intention of definite and early..
September 28, 2011

Indigenous Nationalism in Taiaiake Alfred’s Wasáse I. “Nations” v. “Cultures” A. The idea that Aboriginal peoples are “Nations,” not just “cultures,” has begun to influence the federal government, the courts, and the study of law and political science. Central idea: the importance of an Indigenous homeland and the difficulties of the displacement from that homeland B. Media representations tend to divide “Native culture” and “Native politics” into separate spheres. Problem: “Culturalism” as an approach is often cut off from politics. Dominant culture depoliticizes Indigenous people by “stressing legends and myths…to direct Natives’ attentions away from revolutionary nationalism.” “America loves Indian culture. America is much less enthusiastic about Indian land title.” Craig Womack, Red on Red II. Political and Power Relations: Action-Or iented v. Theor etical A. Some academics have often stayed away from the Political topics within Native literature, such as land ownership, law, and governance. They tend instead to focus on power relations – and on large-scale issues such as colonization, sexism, and so forth. General concepts of colonialism, versus the specific contexts and thus aims and political priorities of Indigenous nations in settler colonies. Easier for non-Natives to condemn generalized Native dispossession, though less easy to support Native people’s specific claims to self– determination, claims that have material consequences. Question to ask to move from theory to practice: Does the work exert a force for change outside the text itself? “Decolonization cannot be limited to deconstructing the dominant story and revealing underlying texts, for none of that helps people improve their current conditions or prevents them from dying.” Linda Smith, Decolonizing Methodologies B. Nationalism as Ethically Suspect 1. Suspicion of “truth claims.” 2. Resistance to action-oriented political writings, because nationalism is typically seen in today’s political climate as a tool used by one culture to obliterate another 3. Differences between American nationalism and Indigenous nationalism in settler colonies: American is based on a shared governmental structure and a presumably shared sense of national community, despite citizens’ different national origins, races, ethnicities, regional identities, religions, and innumerable other forms of diversity. Consider Indigenous nationalism. Tribal communities often do not have a government in place that reflects their status as nations. Each Indigenous nation, however, does share a genetic connection, as well as a certain sense of a shared history and culture. Do you support nationalism and nationalist claims? A. Argument: Personal power by working within colonial system, but entails giving up power in the Indigenous sense because it doesn’t adhere to Indigenous traditions. B. Context Kanien’kehaka (Mohawk) context/conception of nationhood Six Nation..
August 8, 2011

Adopted from roman law there are 3 levels of Capitis  Diminutio (Minima, Media, Maxima (minimum,medium, maximum respectively) 1. Capitis Minima = minimal loss of rights (John Doe) 2. Capitis Media = partial loss of rights (John DOE) 3. Capitis Maxima = full loss of rights (JOHN DOE) It all starts at your birth when your parents fill out your REGISTRATION OF LIVE BIRTH. The parents choose a name for the child. The State or Province take that name and capitalize it. If the state or province is in debt, the name is entirely capitalized, if the state or province is not then just the last name is capitalized. The freeborn child is sold into slavery UNKNOWINGLY by its parents in exchange for benefits like child tax credit, welfare, free health care, school, etc Of course because of the Federal reserve since all money is loaned at interest all states and the country as a whole is always in debt and your name will always be capitalized. The freeborn child has the right to contract out of this when they turn the AGE of MAJORITY usually 18 but 14 in some countries. The government gets you to voluntarily fill out a social security/social insurance form to get an EMPLOYEE number (working papers) for the IRS/CRA. You need this number to access benefits like unemployment insurance or student loans. You become an employee of the IMF/federal gov’t which is a slave to its lender. (National debt). All birth certificates are written on EXCHEQUECHER bank-note paper owned by the CROWN. Even Americans. The corporation of the United States is registered at the Inner City of London England a Roman Enclave of the Vatican. Canada & Australia are registered on the United States Security & Exchange (SEC). You were born free, you are now a slave by choice. You gave up your birthright for a mess of pottage. You filled out all the forms & applications of your free will. So by signing any document that shows your name in full caps you are agreeing to represent the artificial person (JOHN DOE). The only paper you own that represents you with your god given rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Plus all of you constitutional rights is your birth certificate. But only because when your 1 day old you can’t sign away your rights. Check any drivers license, social security card,..
June 18, 2011

“There can only be ONE!” ~ Highlander A paradox is a seemingly true statement or group of statements that lead to a contradiction or a situation which seems to defy logic or intuition. A constitution is a set of fundamental principles or established precedents according to which a state or other organization is governed…written constitutions, also act as limiters of state power by establishing lines which a state’s rulers cannot cross such as fundamental rights. Note: Canada does not have the Authority to Limit our [Six Nations] Constitution, Canada can only define its own understanding and the way it VIEWS its own existence, nothing more nothing less… if they cross the line they have committed crime! This means that Six Nations has NO DUTY TO PERFORM when ORDERED BY CANADA/CROWN, however we can fulfill the order for a PRICE! SIMPLY because we are not a MEMBERS TO THEIR SOCIETY A Society is a voluntary association of individuals for common ends;especially : an organized group working together or periodically meeting because of common interests, beliefs, or profession Their is a separation of Societies in plain view in the form of the Elections canada system, First requirement as a Candidate to run for any Council position, you MUST BE A CANADIAN CITIZEN, and you are barred if you are not canadian, so this tells me Six Nation Does not Even have REPRESENTATION in the Canadian Society, and taxed/regulated/fined/jailed/captured/kidnapped unlawfully because of it! On with the POST! Ive put a lot of thought into what im about to write about, I tried to poke and prod with unusual questions and leading responces while in discussion. Ive learned a fair bit of what it means to be humble and how to humble others. When talking to some one you might not see eye to eye with what you may think is trivial and common sense, however you both have the ability to prove your points and debate until you give in or pursuade your opponant that you are in fact correct and they are left humbled or embarassed they may feel other emotions, but that is up to them how to deal with your presentment. These types of debates are known as The Socratic Method of Debate, you lead the questions to one ultimate undeniable conclusion, This is my personal project to understand the strategy in practice, the point about using this method is to make things self evident without force or trickery. My first test in the line of questioning was simple to understand for most who where asked, see below...
June 3, 2011

When choosing to express upon a peoples position in a certain light just to cast shadows of doubt in the mind of the reader, It is thought wise to fictionalize the characters to diminish the value of the person, thing or subject. This is a typical concept and political ploy to undermine and limit the real people and real events, and for a price the hidden hand can influence what is featured in the media to create or mold a general public opinion in attempts to then generate a manufactured public consensus. With the formation and development of a public consensus or opinion, government and friends aka “local and world media” can then destroy the person, thing or subject with public support however seduced or misguided their beliefs. Public opinion is used to gauge support for protection of Public interests when legal cases are brought before the courts or the public at large, if the judge finds that it is in the best interest of the Public that they carry out what ever decision in favor of public Interest [or public-private corporation investment perception] are acting out what is known as protectionism by omission of information or cases brought before the court that may disrupt public perception and investment potential/capital., which also at time limits the remedy for the parties of interest. So in fact the court is protecting the corporation as it represents the public and its interest, and this is called Preventative Justice and it amounts to tax evasion by preventing justice and awards to protect of is own interests, opinion and bankroll. Does this Sound Fair? Does this look clean? Do your hands need Washing? I like to point out a few basic tenets of the queens ecclesiastical law, this is a reminder of the laws of the Canadian people and their Sovereign as defender of the faith, as I assert and defend my own, and correct the public opinion of Corporate–IN-Justice. “You shall not steal.” Exodus 20:15 “If a man causes a field or vineyard to be grazed over, or lets his beast loose and it feeds in another man’s field, he shall make restitution from the best in his own field and in his own vineyard.” -Exodus 22:5 “Clearly no one is justified before God by the law, because, ‘The righteous will by faith.’ The law is not based on faith; on the contrary,…” –Galations 3:11.12 “We know that the law is good if one uses it properly. We also know that the law is not made for the righteous but..
May 28, 2011

Kanien’kehaka Educator, Author and Activist Taiaiake Alfred talks about the realities and challenges of nativism, decolonization and indigeneity in this lecture, entitled, From Noble Savage to Righteous Warrior: Regenerating and Reinscribing Indigenous Presence. An internationally recognized Kanien’kehaka (Mohwak) intellectual and political advisor, Taiaiake Alfred is well known for his incisive critiques and groundbreaking work in the fields of Indigenous governance and political philosophy.
May 13, 2011

It seems to me there is confusion on this issue. Here are some of my thoughts on the issue. Obviously we possess our bodies. Does this imply that we own them? I would ask you consider this: I am holding a hammer in my hand. I am obviously in possession of the hammer. Does this imply that I own it? What if I had borrowed it from you? I’m in possession, but you are the owner. So possession does not equal ownership, agreed? What then creates ownership? If there is no one but me on a desert island, possession and ownership have no measurable difference. As soon as another entity shows up, the difference between ownership and possession will start to become apparent. If I lay down my hammer, or rather, THE hammer, and the new entity picks it up, what is its ownership situation? Does it still remain in my ownership even though it’s in the other’s possession? I suggest to you that ownership is not possible outside of understanding. Ownership is a mental construct. Possession is physical and demonstrable, but ownership is mental. Basically, the concept of ownership is something that must be mentally understood by all parties to be effective. My point is basically this: Ownership is a function of agreement. All parties need to understand that there is an idea of property and ownership before ownership can exist. Not only that, these parties must agree to the ownership, otherwise it is more of a wish (on the part of the possessor) than actual ownership. Just because I am holding this hammer does not mean that I own it. Ownership relies on the fact that you understand the concept of property and grant that the hammer is mine. Otherwise it is not owned by me, it is simply possessed. Ownership is based upon–relies upon–agreement. This does not mean that theft is impossible. You can understand that the hammer is mine and still steal it from me. You possess MY hammer at that point. Against my wishes. If you simply take my hammer that I left laying on the ground, not knowing that it is “mine,” you have not stolen it, you have simply acquired it. It is not theft until you know that it is mine. Your knowledge of the “private property” of the hammer is required before it can be considered theft. Not only that, but the intent to..
March 9, 2011

U.S. President Barack Obama slipped a subtle comment into his inauguration “mind control” speech on January 20th. When Obama defined America as a nation of “Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus and non-believers”, he deliberately left out Indigenous peoples. We have our value systems. We have our knowledge. He sneaked in the intention to ignore us when he said that “the lines of tribe shall soon dissolve”. To Americans the word “tribe” means the Onkwehonwe. We are the caretakers and trustees of the lands and resources of the world which the New World Order NWO or One World “Government” must steal to control the world. Our role puts us squarely in the path of this grand scheme of a few bankers, the governments they control and their deadly enforcement agencies. Colonial “band or tribal councils” will be put in charge of indigenous people where possible such as Iraq and Afghanistan. Other Indigenous peoples will be “eliminated” or ignored. It looks like this program will be run by the United Nations “International Department of Indian Affairs” on behalf of the NWO war mongers. Obama’s main message is, “If you don’t do it the American way, we will crush you”. It is all the more “devious” because it’s coming in this velvet glove that claims that it’s being done in a spirit of coöperation. The real message is, “we will defeat you”. A new disease is being spread called “Obama fever”. The symptoms are flag waving, millions gathering and clapping like a bunch of trained seals and hypnotic sectarian rapping. O-Ba-Ma, O-Ba-Ma! The following are comments by “Native Pride” and MNN Mohawk Nation News: Tuesday, January 20, 2009: Obama: The New Lincoln? We Hope Not! As the US crowns its new king, the world looks on with [media guided] hope and wonder. The former Illinois Senator has been compared to one of the most popular US Presidents, Abraham Lincoln who was seen as the Great Emancipator, Freer of the Slaves and the Healer of a Divided Nation. Obama swore his oath of office on Lincoln’s Bible. Buried in that era of slavery and Civil War are a few chapters of the American “Indian” Holocaust of 115 million, the biggest in all humanity, that began long before Lincoln and continues today. While Mr. Lincoln was earning a fake place in history, he signed the Homestead Act in 1862. This was a law offering huge..
November 9, 2010
Archive Thumb
First you have to understand the problem. What is the unknown? What are the data? What is the condition? Is it possible to satisfy the condition? Is the condition sufficient to determine the unknown? Or is it insufficient? Or redundant? Or contradictory? Draw a figure. Introduce suitable notation. Separate the various parts of the condition. Can you write them down? Devising a Plan Find the connection between the data and the unknown. You may be obliged to consider auxiliary problems if an immediate connection cannot be found. You should obtain eventually a plan of the solution. Have you seen it before? Or have you seen the same problem in a slightly different form? Do you know a related problem? Do you know a theorem that could be useful? Look at the unknown! And try to think of a familiar problem having the same or a similar unknown. Here is a problem related to yours and solved before. Could you use it? Could you use its result? Could you use its method? Should you introduce some auxiliary element in order to make its use possible? Could you restate the problem? Could you restate it still differently? Go back to the definitions. If you cannot solve the proposed problem try to solve first some related problem. Could you imagine a more accessible related problem? A more general problem? A more special problem? An analogous problem? Can you solve a part of the problem.? Keep only a part of the condition, drop the other part; how far is the unknown then determined, how can it vary? Could you derive something useful from the data? Could you think of other data appropriate to determine the unknown? Could you change the unknown or the data, or both if necessary, so that the new unknown and the new data are nearer to each other? Did you use all the data? Did you use the whole condition? Have you taken into account all essential notions involved in the problem? Carrying out the Plan. Carrying out your plan of the solution, check each step. Can you see clearly that the step is correct? Can you prove that it is correct? Looking back. Examine the solution obtained. Can you check the result? Can you check the argument? Can you derive the result differently? Can you see it at a glance? Can you use the result, or the method, for..
October 21, 2010
Archive Thumb
The official state (…of mind) office known as “PERSON” This is the single most important lesson that you MUST learn. If you spend an hour to learn this material you will be rewarded for the rest of your life. The word “person” in legal terminology is perceived as a general word which normally includes in its scope a variety of entities other than human beings. See e.g. 1 U.S.C. sec 1. Church of Scientology v. U.S. Dept. of Justice (1979) 612 F.2d 417, 425. One of the very first of your state statutes will have a section listed entitled “Definitions.” Carefully study this section of the statutes and you will find a portion that reads similar to this excerpt: In construing these statutes and each and every word, phrase, or part hereof, where the context will permit: (1) The singular includes the plural and vice versa. (2) Gender-specific language includes the other gender and neuter. (3) The word “person” includes: an individual, firm, association, joint venture, partnership, trust, business trust, syndicate, fiduciary, limited liability company, association, cooperative, corporation whether or not organized for profit, estate and all other groups or combinations. NOTE HOWEVER, THE STATUTE DEFINITION DOES NOT LIST MAN OR WOMAN — THEREFORE THEY ARE EXCLUDED FROM ALL THE STATUTES !!! Under the rule of construction “expressio unius est exclusio alterius,” where a statute or Constitution enumerates the things on which it is to operate or forbids certain things, it is ordinarily to be construed as excluding from its operation all those not expressly mentioned. Generally words in a statute should be given their plain and ordinary meaning. When a statute does not specifically define words, such words should be construed in their common or ordinary sense to the effect that the rules used in construing statutes are also applicable in the construction of the Constitution. It is a fundamental rule of statutory construction that words of common usage when used in a statute should be construed in their plain and ordinary sense. If you carefully read the statute laws enacted by your state legislature you will also notice that they are all written with phrases similar to these five examples : 1. A person commits the offense of failure to carry a license if the person . . . 2. A person commits the offense of failure to register a vehicle if the person . . . 3...
August 14, 2010
Archive Thumb
To the contribution of the Iroquois Confederacy of Nations to the development of the US Constitution and to reaffirm the continuing Government-to-Government relationship between Indian Tribes and the United States established in The Constitution – December 2, 1987 Washington, DC
December 2, 1986
Archive Thumb
The Onkwehonwe of the Kanonhshonni made a treaty with the early Dutch people when they came to this continent. The Onkwehonwe lived very happily enjoying life the way the Creator intended.
November 13, 1978
Archive Thumb
All Indians are free of duties passing or repassing the boundary lines of the United States and Canada, and also free of taxes, licences in trading and selling bead-work, bark-work, baskets, snow shoes, medicines, (etc, etc:.) of their own manufacturing in premises.
June 1, 1970
Archive Thumb
Seth Newhouse was  a remarkable man with an unusual dedication to recording and preserving the history of the Iroquois Confederacy.
January 12, 1949
Archive Thumb
Six Nations Shows Treaty Granting Them Independent Sovereignty as Long as Sun Shines By Howard McLellan, reprinted from The New York Times, June 7, 1925.
June 7, 1925
Archive Thumb
It is observed with alarm that the holding of dances by the Indians on their reserves is on increase, and that these practices tend to disorganize the efforts which the Department is putting forth to make them self-supporting.
December 15, 1921
Archive Thumb
The Six Nations Domain, Ontario, Canada
August 29, 1920
Archive Thumb
Prepared by a committee of Chiefs, Presented and read May 16 1911
May 16, 1911