Tag Archives: #US

NATIVES SAY NO TO STEPHEN HARPERS RE-ELECTION

Par­lia­men­tary law bars Harper from re-election. Found guilty of a cul­ture of abuse of Parliament:

On Fri­day March 25, 2011 the Cana­dian House of Com­mons found Prime Min­is­ter Stephen Harper guilty of con­tempt of Par­lia­ment. Accord­ing to par­lia­men­tary law, con­tempt of par­lia­ment is a fed­eral crime. Being that Harper has been found guilty of a crime Harper is barred from seek­ing re-election on May 2, 2011. No fed­eral gov­ern­ment or cab­i­net min­is­ter has ever been found in con­tempt before.

The vote by the Cana­dian House of Com­mons is very much the same as an impeach­ment of the pres­i­dent of the United States of Amer­ica. In the US if a pres­i­dent or US law­maker is impeached (a for­mal process in which an offi­cial is accused of unlaw­ful activ­ity) that per­son is removed from office and can­not run for office again. Richard Nixon avoided a vote of impeach­ment by resign­ing as pres­i­dent. Harper was essen­tially impeached from the gov­ern­ment of Canada for the fed­eral crime of con­tempt of Par­lia­ment. As a direct result of the House of Com­mons vote the Harper gov­ern­ment was dis­solved. As Stephen Harper was found guilty of unlaw­ful activ­i­ties he is no longer deemed fit to be the Prime Min­is­ter of Canada and an elec­tion was called to chose a new leader.

If Stephen Harper has been found guilty of the fed­eral crime of con­tempt of Par­lia­ment why is he run­ning again for the same office that he was removed from? Par­lia­men­tary law bars Harper from run­ning again in the upcom­ing elec­tion. Under the Con­sti­tu­tion Act, 1867, Par­lia­ment is empow­ered to deter­mine the qual­i­fi­ca­tions of mem­bers of the House of Com­mons. The present qual­i­fi­ca­tions are out­lined in the Canada Elec­tions Act, which was passed in 2000. The acts bars indi­vid­u­als found guilty of election-related crimes and are pro­hib­ited from becom­ing mem­bers for five years (in some cases, seven years) after con­vic­tion. The House of Com­mons voted unan­i­mously to judge Stephen Harper on election-related (par­lia­ment) crimes and declared Harper guilty of the crim­i­nal charge of con­tempt of par­lia­ment. The House of Com­mons vote handed Harper a guilty con­vic­tion and as pun­ish­ment for his crime his lead­er­ship was imme­di­ately stripped.

The prime min­is­ter of a minor­ity gov­ern­ment only holds his or her office as long as the “con­fi­dence of the house” is main­tained. If mem­bers of the lower house lose faith in the leader for what­ever rea­son, they can call a vote of no con­fi­dence and force the PM to resign. Such a vote of no con­fi­dence was made against Stephen Harper on Fri­day March 25, 2011. That vote not only declared that Stephen Harper no longer had the con­fi­dence of the house but the house also found Stephen Harper guilty of the seri­ous crim­i­nal offense of con­tempt of par­lia­ment. Con­tempt of Par­lia­ment is the crime of obstruct­ing the par­lia­ment in the car­ry­ing out of its func­tions, or of hin­der­ing any Mem­ber of Par­lia­ment in the per­for­mance of his or her duties.

The high­est duty of a Prime Min­is­ter of Par­lia­ment is to uphold the Con­sti­tu­tion of Canada, which includes the rights and priv­i­leges of the House of Com­mons and the duties owed to the Queen’s rep­re­sen­ta­tive in Canada. Stephen Harper keeps on fail­ing in his duties on both counts as evi­denced by 2 con­sec­u­tive pro­ro­ga­tion of Par­lia­ment. Stephen Harper forced the Queen’s rep­re­sen­ta­tive to dis­solve Par­lia­ment just so the Con­ser­v­a­tives could avoid los­ing a vote of con­fi­dence in the House of Commons.

The first unde­mo­c­ra­tic shut down of Par­lia­ment by Stephen Harper was clearly to avoid the scrutiny of a House of Com­mons com­mit­tee over the mount­ing evi­dence of will­ful com­plic­ity by the Harper gov­ern­ment over the trans­fer of Afghan detainees to a sub­stan­tial risk of tor­ture. This is a war crime and one of the most seri­ous alle­ga­tions any gov­ern­ment has faced in the his­tory of Canada. Stephen Harper did every­thing pos­si­ble to hide from a vote of con­fi­dence, and on Dec. 4, 2008 Stephen Harper uni­lat­er­ally shut down Par­lia­ment. The Gov­er­nor Gen­eral had lit­tle option but to grant the unde­mo­c­ra­tic request to avoid a polit­i­cal cri­sis in Canada. It had put her into an unten­able position.

There was no prece­dent in any par­lia­men­tary democ­racy any­where in the world where a demo­c­ra­tic par­lia­ment was shut down to hide from a vote of con­fi­dence. It opened the door for other abuses of the rights and priv­i­leges of the major­ity of Mem­bers of Par­lia­ment elected by Cana­di­ans. Harper has went through that door again. This time the Gov­er­nor Gen­eral did not even merit a per­sonal visit by Stephen Harper to be told to shut down Par­lia­ment until early March. Respect, even for the Queen’s rep­re­sen­ta­tive, by Stephen Harper is in short supply.

This unde­mo­c­ra­tic crim­i­nal behav­ior by Stephen Harper is another piece of evi­dence of a major shift in Cana­dian con­sti­tu­tional democ­racy tak­ing shape. First, there was the uncon­sti­tu­tional behav­ior of the Harper gov­ern­ment to deny the com­mit­tee uncen­sored doc­u­ments despite a sub­poena by the House of Com­mons. Sec­ondly, there was the Harper ordered boy­cott of the com­mit­tee by the Con­ser­v­a­tive MPs at the com­mit­tee. Thirdly, we saw the forced adjourn­ment of the Mil­i­tary Police Com­plaints Com­mis­sion inquiry of the Stephen Harper’s com­plic­ity in tor­ture and the Stephen Harper fir­ing of its chief inves­ti­ga­tor, Peter Tins­ley. This com­mis­sion, a quasi-judicial tri­bunal has been stymied in its attempt to deter­mine the truth over the detainee trans­fer issue. Finally, there was the unprece­dented attempts by Stephen Harper to slan­der Richard Colvin, a senior Cana­dian diplo­mat who was a key wit­ness in the Cana­dian Afghan detainee issue, for just doing his job of speak­ing truth to power and then accus­ing any­body who sup­ports him of either being Tal­iban dupes or under­min­ing our brave Cana­dian mil­i­tary heroes.

These are seri­ous exam­ples of abuse of exec­u­tive power over Par­lia­ment, the Gov­er­nor Gen­eral, the pub­lic ser­vice and ulti­mately the Cana­dian vot­ers who elected MPs to make Par­lia­ment work. There is only one per­son who is respon­si­ble for and has been found guilty of such abuse of power, for such dis­dain towards the author­ity of the people’s par­lia­ment, for such dis­re­spect towards the Cana­dian peo­ple and for total dis­re­gard for the rule of law. His name is Stephen Harper.

Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Don’t pay attention to that man behind the curtain

Wizard_of_OZ___Emerald_City_by_marchine

wizard of ozToto, I have a feel­ing we’re not in Kansas anymore

The Wiz­ard of Oz: as extracted from ‘Crack­ing the Code’
Don’t pay atten­tion to that man behind the cur­tain — just fol­low that yel­low brick road and do as you are told!

WHOLESALE — To sell by whole­sale is to sell by large parcels, gen­er­ally in orig­i­nal pack­ages, and not by retail. Black’s Law Dic­tio­nary, 1st Edi­tion. Com­pare retail.

Note: The US gov­ern­ment acquired title to our birth cer­tifi­cates in whole­sale, or bulk pur­chase. Re the double-entry book­keep­ing sys­tem of the Depart­ment of the Trea­sury, whole­sale is the debit, or Pub­lic side, and retail is the credit, or pri­vate side.

WIZARD OF OZ, THE. Motion Pic­ture, 1939, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, book by L. Frank Baum; adap­ta­tion for the screen by Noël Lan­g­ley; screen­play by Noël Lan­g­ley, Flo­rence Ryer­son, and Edgar Allan Woolf; Lyrics by E.Y. Har­burg; Pro­duced by Mervyn LeRoy; Directed by Vic­tor Fleming.

Note: Just as you can read between the gory lines in the news­pa­per on any day and dis­cover clues issued by the Pow­ers That Be — if you look hard enough — as to what is actu­ally going on, such notice can also be found in lighter faire, like the movies. Such a movie was The Wiz­ard of Oz, an alle­gory for the new state of affairs in Amer­ica in the 1930’s fol­low­ing the stock mar­ket crash and fac­tual bank­ruptcy of the US Gov­ern­ment imme­di­ately there-after.

The set­ting was Kansas — Heart­land Amer­ica, and geo­graph­i­cal cen­ter of the USA. In comes the twister, the tor­nado, i.e. whirling, con­fu­sion — the stock mar­ket crash, theft of America’s: gold, US bank­ruptcy, the Great Depres­sion — and whisks Dorothy and Toto up into a new, arti­fi­cial dimen­sion some­where above the solid ground of Kansas. When they finally land in Oz, Dorothy com­ments to her lit­tle companion:

Toto, — I have a feel­ing we’re not in Kansas anymore.”

That’s right. After the bank­ruptcy, Kansas was no longer just “plain old Kansas”- it was now “KS,” an arti­fi­cial cor­po­rate venue of the bank­rupt United States, newly estab­lished “fed­eral ter­ri­tory,” part of the “Fed­eral Zone,” and Dorothy and Toto were “in this state” (see “in this state”).

In the 1930s, the all-capital letters-written (see all-capital letters-written) STRAWMAN (see straw­man), newly cre­ated arti­fi­cial aspect of the for­mer Amer­i­can sov­er­eigns, had no brain-and Amer­i­cans were too con­fused and dis­tracted by all the com­mo­tion to fig­ure out that they even had a straw­man. The Scare­crow iden­ti­fied his straw­man per­sona for Dorothy:

Some peo­ple with­out brains do an awful lot of talk­ing. Of course, I’m not bright, about doing things.”

And in his clas­sic song, “If I Only had a Brain,” the Scarecrow/Strawman suc­cinctly augured:

I’d unravel every rid­dle, For every ‘indi­vid­dle’, (see indi­vid­ual) In trou­ble, or in pain.“
Trans­la­tion: Once one dis­cov­ers that his straw man exists, all polit­i­cal and legal mys­ter­ies, com­plex­i­ties, and con­fu­sions are resolved-and once one takes title to his straw man, he can pro­tect him­self from any legal trou­ble or legal damage.

The Tin Man, or “T-I-N” (Tax­payer Iden­ti­fi­ca­tion Number-Man), was a hol­low man of metal, a “ves­sel,” or “vehi­cle” (see ves­sel, vehi­cle), newly cre­ated com­mer­cial code words for the straw man. Just like the Straw Man had no brain, this Tin Man ves­sel had no heart. Both were “arti­fi­cial per­sons” (see per­son). One of the def­i­n­i­tions of “tin” in Webster’s is “coun­ter­feit.” The Tin Man also rep­re­sented the mechan­i­cal and heart­less aspect of com­merce and com­mer­cial law. Just like they say in the Mafia: “Noth­ing per­sonal — it’s just busi­ness.” The heart­less Tin Man also car­ried an ax, tra­di­tional sym­bol for God — i.e. mod­ern com­mer­cial law — in most ear­lier dom­i­nant civ­i­liza­tions, includ­ing fas­cist states. In the words of the Tin Man, express­ing relief after Dorothy had oiled his arm:

I’ve held that ax up for ages”.

The word “Ace” is ety­mo­log­i­cally related to the word “ax,” and in a deck of cards the only one above the King is the Ace, i.e. God. One of the “Axis” pow­ers of World War II, Italy, was a fas­cist state. The sym­bol for fas­cism is the “fasces,” a bun­dle of rods with an ax bound up in the mid­dle and its blade pro­ject­ing. The fasces may be found on the reverse of the Amer­i­can Mercury-headed Dime (the Roman deity Mer­cury was the God of Com­merce), and on the wall behind, and on each side of, the Speaker’s podium in the US Sen­ate (each gold fasces is approx­i­mately six feet in height). At the base of the Seal of the US Sen­ate are two crossed fasces.

The Lion, “king of beasts,” or “king of ani­mals’ (some mem­bers of soci­ety regard you as noth­ing more than an ani­mal, prin­ci­pally “cat­tle”) – a den­i­gra­tion in itself – rep­re­sent­ing the once-fearless Amer­i­can peo­ple, had lost his courage. After your first round with the UCC-constituted IRS “defend­ing” your T-I-N man dummy cor­po­ra­tion vessel/vehicle, indi­vid­ual employee, pub­lic cor­po­ra­tion all-capital letters-written name, arti­fi­cial per­son straw man, you prob­a­bly lost some of your courage too. You don’t know it, but the IRS has been deal­ing with you strictly under the laws of com­merce. Just like the Tin Man, com­merce is heartless.

To find the Wiz­ard you had to “fol­low the yel­low brick road,” i.e. fol­low the trail of America’s stolen gold and you will find the thief who stole it. In the begin­ning of the movie the Wiz­ard was rep­re­sented by the trav­el­ing mys­tic, “Pro­fes­sor Mar­vel,” whom Dorothy encoun­tered when she ran away with Toto. His macabre shin­gle touted that he was “Acclaimed by the Crowned Heads of Europe, Past, Present and Future.” Boy, that Pro­fes­sor Mar­vel must have been a reg­u­lar wiz­ard to be acclaimed by the future crowned heads of Europe – before they were even crowned! Before the bankers stole Amer­ica, they had long since dis­em­pow­ered the Chris­t­ian Monar­chies of Europe and looted their king­doms. Maybe this “Pro­fes­sor Mar­vel” fel­low knew some­thing about the future that other folks didn’t. With a human skull peer­ing down from its painted perch above the door inside his wagon, the good Pro­fes­sor lec­tured Dorothy of the Priests of Isis and Osiris and the days of the Pharaohs of Egypt.

When Dorothy Gale and her new friends emerged from the for­est they were elated to see Emer­ald City before them, only a short jaunt away. The Wicked Witch of the West, des­per­ate for the Ruby Slip­pers that Dorothy was wear­ing, would have to make her move before our heroes were inside the walls. A sig­nif­i­cant point here is that in the orig­i­nal book, The Won­der­ful Wiz­ard of Oz, pub­lished in 1900, (39 years ear­lier), the Slip­pers were not ruby, or red, but sil­ver. At the time the book was writ­ten Amer­ica still had all its gold and sil­ver, and the value of one ounce of gold was set at 15 ounces of sil­ver — sil­ver being the more plen­ti­ful of the two met­als. Just as the Sil­ver Slip­pers car­ried Dorothy, America’s stock­pile of sil­ver and gold — back­ing the cur­rency — car­ried the coun­try to a posi­tion or pre-eminence through­out the world at the time. But, as men­tioned, when the movie came out in 1939 the Slip­pers were not sil­ver, but red.

Between 1916 and 1933, most of America’s gold was rounded up by the pri­vate Fed­eral Reserve Bank and shipped off to the Fed own­ers in Eng­land, Ger­many and France. The rea­son for this was that the use of Fed­eral Reserve Notes (FRN’s) car­ried an inter­est penalty that could only be paid in gold. Our pre­vi­ous cur­rency, United States Notes (USN’s), car­ried no such inter­est require­ment – but such was the bar­gain that came with the Fed­eral Reserve Notes. When bank­ruptcy was declared in 1933, Amer­i­cans were required to turn in all gold coin, gold bul­lion and gold cer­tifi­cates by May the 1st – May Day — the anniver­sary of the birth of Com­mu­nism in 1776. Talk­ing to peo­ple who were alive at the time, you may find out that the gen­eral sen­ti­ment toward such thiev­ery bor­dered on a sec­ond rev­o­lu­tion. Maybe it was just too much of a clue, or too much salt in the wound for Dorothy to be skip­ping down the “Yel­low Brick Road” in a pair of “Sil­ver Slip­pers” so, for what­ever rea­son, a color less likely to annoy or pro­voke was selected.

With regard to the choice of “Ruby,” or red–col­ored Slip­pers, one expla­na­tion is this: On doc­u­ments and the like, red is a very sig­nif­i­cant color. It sig­ni­fies “Pri­vate,” as opposed to “Pub­lic.” Your new Social Secu­rity Card has a red ser­ial num­ber on the reverse. The red Reg­is­tered Mail sticker says “United States Post Office Depart­ment” – all other mail is marked “United States Postal Ser­vice.” But no mat­ter their color in the Movie, the Wicked Witch of the West had big plans to get her hands on the Slip­pers before Dorothy and crew could make it to Emer­ald city.

Her tac­tic was to drug them all into uncon­scious­ness by cov­er­ing the coun­try­side with poppy flow­ers, or “pop­pies,” the source of heroin, opium and mor­phine, and then waltz in and snatch the Slip­pers. In other words, the best way to boost the gold was to some­how dull the senses of the Amer­i­can peo­ple (Note: LSD was cre­ated in 1939 by Dr. Albert Hoff­man). The poppies/drugs worked on Dorothy, the Lion and Toto, the flesh and blood enti­ties, but had no effect on the Scare­crow or the Tin Man, the arti­fi­cial enti­ties. The two of them cried out for help and Glenda, the Good Witch of the North, answered their prayers with a blan­ket of snow and nul­li­fied the nar­cotic effect of the pop­pies on Dorothy, the Lion and Toto.

As they scam­pered toward Emer­ald city — the city of green (Fed­eral Reserve Notes, the new fiat “money,” or “money by decree”), we heard The Munchkins singing on the glory of the Wizard’s creation:

You’re out of the woods,
You’re out of the dark,
You’re out of the night,
Step into the sun, step into the light,
Keep straight ahead for,
the most glo­ri­ous place on the face of the Earth or stars!

The fore­go­ing jin­gle abounds with Illuminist-Luciferian sym­bols and metaphors re; dark­ness and light.

The Wicked Witch of the West made her home in a round, medieval watch­tower, ancient sym­bol of the Knights Tem­plar of Freema­sonry, who are given to prac­tice witch­craft and also cred­ited as the orig­i­na­tors of mod­ern bank­ing, circa 1099 A.D. The Wicked Witch of the West was also dressed in black, the color sym­bol­iz­ing the planet Sat­urn, sacred icon of the Knights Tem­plar and the color of choice of judges and priests for their robes. Who was the Wicked Witch of the West? Remem­ber, in the first part of the film her coun­ter­part was “Almira Gulch,” who, accord­ing to Aunt Em, “owned half the county.” Miss Gulch alleged that Dorothy’s dog, Toto, had bit­ten her. She came to the farm with an “Order from the Sher­iff” demand­ing that they sur­ren­der Toto to her cus­tody. Aunt Em was not imme­di­ately co-operative, and answered Miss Gulch’s alle­ga­tions that Toto had bit­ten her.

He’s really gen­tle. With gen­tle peo­ple, that is.”
Could “gen­tle” really mean “Gen­tile”? (see Gen­tile) When Miss Gulch defied them to with­hold Toto and “go against the law,” dear old Aunt Em was rel­e­gated to “push­ing the Party line” for Big Brother. She duti­fully suc­cumbed to the pres­sure and coun­seled Dorothy reluctantly;

We can’t go against the law, Dorothy. I’m afraid poor Toto will have to go.”
When Dorothy refused to sur­ren­der Toto, Miss Gulch lashed out:

If you don’t hand over the dog I’ll bring a dam­age suit that’ll take your whole farm.”
Today 70% of all attor­neys in the world reside in the west – Amer­ica, to be exact – and 95% of all law­suits in the world are filed under US juris­dic­tion. The Wicked Witch of the West and Miss Gulch, my dear friends, rep­re­sent judges and attor­neys: i.e. the Amer­i­can legal sys­tem (includ­ing the attorney-run US Con­gress), exe­cu­tioner and pri­mary hench­men for trans­fer­ring all wealth in Amer­ica – every­thing – (And Aus­tralia and all other coun­tries – Ed.) from the peo­ple over to the banks and the gov­ern­ment (see Note at bar). The Wicked Witch of the West wanted the Sil­ver Slip­pers – the pre­cious met­als – and her coun­ter­part, Miss Gulch, wanted to take Toto. What does the word “Toto” mean in “attor­ney lan­guage,” i.e. Latin? “Everything!”

Dorothy and the gang fell for the Wizard’s illu­sion in the begin­ning, but soon wised up and dis­cov­ered the Wiz­ard for what he was: a con­fi­dence man. When asked about help­ing the Scarecrow/Straw man, among other bab­blings about “get­ting a brain” and “uni­ver­si­ties” the Wiz­ard also cited “the land of ’E Pluribus Unum,” which is Latin for “One out of many” i.e. con­vert­ing the many into one = New World Order, or Novus Ordo Seclo­rum, a Latin phrase placed on the Amer­i­can One Dol­lar Bill shortly after bank­ruptcy. He also proudly revealed/confessed that he was:

Born and brad in the heart of the West­ern wilder­ness, an old Kansas man myself!”
The bankers did pretty well in Europe, but as the Wiz­ard pointed out, they made a killing in the “West­ern wilder­ness,” with the theft of Amer­i­can gold, labor and prop­erty from the – quot­ing John D. Rock­e­feller – “grate­ful and respon­sive rural folk” who pop­u­lated the coun­try at the time.

When Dorothy asked Glenda, the Good Witch of the North (Santa Claus, Chris­tian­ity), for help in get­ting back to Kansas, Glenda replied:

You don’t need to be helped. You’ve always had the power to go back to Kansas.”
Trans­la­tion: you’ve always had the right and power to reclaim your sov­er­eignty, you just for­got. The actual act of reclaim­ing your sov­er­eignty – rem­edy (see rem­edy) – a sim­ple UCC-1 Form to the Sec­re­tary of State, and Invoice and Bill of Exchange to the Sec­re­tary of the Trea­sury, can be com­pleted from scratch in a few hours.

Amer­ica and Amer­i­cans have inti­mate first­hand knowl­edge of the heart­less mechan­ics of the laws of com­merce, reli­giously applied by the unreg­is­tered for­eign agents at the Inter­nal Rev­enue Ser­vice. The IRS, col­lec­tion agency for the pri­vate Fed­eral Reserve Bank, was con­sulted under the UCC in 1954 and has been oper­at­ing strictly in that realm ever since.

You may have won­dered what is the mean­ing behind the words in the title “The Wiz­ard of Oz.” Look them up in the dic­tio­nary. Like almost every­thing else, it’s right out there in the open for you to see if you will just look closely enough. One def­i­n­i­tion of “wiz­ard” is: “a per­son of high pro­fes­sional skill or knowl­edge.” “O-z” is an abbre­vi­a­tion of “onza,” o-n-z-a, the Ital­ian word for “ounce,’ or “ounces,” the unit of mea­sure­ment of gold, sil­ver and other pre­cious met­als. No mat­ter how large the quan­tity of gold or sil­ver being dis­cussed, the amount is always expressed in ounces. E.g. rather than “hun­dreds of tons” of gold, it’s “so many mil­lion ounces” of gold. As attested by the fac­tual his­tory of this coun­try: “The Wiz­ard of Oz.” was The Wiz­ard of Ounces.

Every­thing worked out for Dorothy, i.e. the Amer­i­can peo­ple, in the end and she “made it home.” Mean­ing: there is rem­edy in law (see rem­edy). It’s there – it was just encoded and dis­guised and cam­ou­flaged. For­tu­nately, the code has been cracked, and there is a way home, just like in the movie. Like Dorothy said, “There’s no place like home.” – and there isn’t! There’s noth­ing like sov­er­eignty for a sov­er­eign! (see note at vice-admiralty courts) We have com­mer­cial rem­edy in the Redemp­tion process. Will you con­tinue to be conned by the con­fi­dence men and wor­ship the Wizard’s light show, or will you wise up like Dorothy did and “look behind the scenes”?

In the com­men­tary above, each time you read the word, ”see”, the reader is being ref­er­enced to Black’s Law Dic­tio­nary 1st Edition.

Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment