Tag Archives: #light

Radical Labels, are we Entitled, or are we The Title?

When choos­ing to express upon a peo­ples posi­tion in a cer­tain light just to cast shad­ows of doubt in the mind of the reader, It is thought wise to fic­tion­al­ize the char­ac­ters to dimin­ish the value of the per­son, thing or subject.

This is a typ­i­cal con­cept and polit­i­cal ploy to under­mine and limit the real peo­ple and real events, and for a price the hid­den hand can influ­ence what is fea­tured in the media to cre­ate or mold a gen­eral pub­lic opin­ion in attempts to then gen­er­ate a man­u­fac­tured pub­lic consensus.

With the for­ma­tion and devel­op­ment of a pub­lic con­sen­sus or opin­ion, gov­ern­ment and friends aka “local and world media” can then destroy the per­son, thing or sub­ject with pub­lic sup­port how­ever seduced or mis­guided their beliefs.

Pub­lic opin­ion is used to gauge sup­port for pro­tec­tion of Pub­lic inter­ests when legal cases are brought before the courts or the pub­lic at large, if the judge finds that it is in the best inter­est of the Pub­lic that they carry out what ever deci­sion in favor of pub­lic Inter­est [or public-private cor­po­ra­tion invest­ment per­cep­tion] are act­ing out what is known as pro­tec­tion­ism by omis­sion of infor­ma­tion or cases brought before the court that may dis­rupt pub­lic per­cep­tion and invest­ment potential/capital., which also at time lim­its the rem­edy for the par­ties of interest.

So in fact the court is pro­tect­ing the cor­po­ra­tion as it rep­re­sents the pub­lic and its inter­est, and this is called Pre­ven­ta­tive Jus­tice and it amounts to tax eva­sion by pre­vent­ing jus­tice and awards to pro­tect of is own inter­ests, opin­ion and bankroll.

Does this Sound Fair? Does this look clean? Do your hands need Washing?

I like to point out a few basic tenets of the queens eccle­si­as­ti­cal law, this is a reminder of the laws of the Cana­dian peo­ple and their Sov­er­eign as defender of the faith, as I assert and defend my own, and cor­rect the pub­lic opin­ion of Cor­po­rate–IN-Justice.

“You shall not steal.” Exo­dus 20:15

“If a man causes a field or vine­yard to be grazed over, or lets his beast loose and it feeds in another man’s field, he shall make resti­tu­tion from the best in his own field and in his own vine­yard.” -Exo­dus 22:5

“Clearly no one is jus­ti­fied before God by the law, because, ‘The right­eous will by faith.’ The law is not based on faith; on the con­trary,…” –Gala­tions 3:11.12

“We know that the law is good if one uses it prop­erly. We also know that the law is not made for the right­eous but for law­break­ers and rebels, the ungodly and sin­ful, the unholy and irre­li­gious; for those who kill their fathers or moth­ers, for mur­der­ers, for adul­ter­ers and per­verts, for slave traders and liars and per­jur­ers– and for what­ever else is con­trary to the sound doc­trine that con­forms to the glo­ri­ous gospel of the blessed God, which he entrusted to me.” –I Tim­o­thy 1:8–11

“There is only one Law­giver and Judge, the one who is able to save and destroy.” James 4:12  “Do not add to what I [the LORD] com­mand you and do not sub­tract from it, but keep the com­mands of the Lord your God that I give you.” –Duet. 4:2

“Woe to those who make unjust laws, to those who issue oppres­sive decrees, to deprive the poor of their rights and with­hold jus­tice from the oppressed of my peo­ple, mak­ing wid­ows their prey and rob­bing the father­less.” –Isa­iah 10:1, 2

Below is a sam­ple letter:

sent to the brant­ford­ex­pos­tior indi­cat­ing the char­ac­ter­i­za­tion that dimin­ishes the value of our per­sons, things and sub­jects, and whether they will acknowl­edge it or not is an act of Geno­cide and/or Politicide.

Hello and Greet­ing on this day of Fri­day March 25th 2011,

I have read a few of the expos­i­tors arti­cles regard­ing the onkwe­honwe “six nations peo­ples” and have con­cern of the use of the word you choose to con­tin­u­ously define the asso­ci­ated fam­i­lies “clans” and/or pri­vate mem­bers or to char­ac­ter­ize the asso­ci­ated fam­i­lies or pri­vate mem­bers as so called FACTIONS please pro­vide me with your Def­i­n­i­tion and your Edi­to­r­ial Inter­pre­ta­tion of the selected word [FACTIONS].

If you can not pro­vide me with your under­stand­ing of the word; FACTIONS, I will hon­or­ably ask that you choose a word you under­stand and can pro­vide the def­i­n­i­tion for, the con­tin­ual mis­use of the word FACTIONS may imply that you are in-fact mak­ing a legal deter­mi­na­tion about the pri­vate mem­bers and fam­i­lies asso­ci­ated and linked with the orga­ni­za­tion of the needs of our com­mu­nity at whole or in part, and may pose a threat to the six nations gen­eral liberties.

My under­stand­ing of the word FACTIONS may imply:

1) party strife and intrigue; dis­sen­sion: an era of fac­tion and trea­son.
2) a form of writ­ing or film­mak­ing that treats real peo­ple or events as if they were fic­tional or uses them as an inte­gral part of a fic­tional account.
3) lit­er­ary work com­pris­ing a dra­ma­tized pre­sen­ta­tion of actual events

What I believe you mean by attempt­ing to rede­fine our families/clans/unit/posse as a whole or in part, you may find that the words “Fam­i­lies and Pri­vate Mem­bers”, would have a greater reflec­tion of our peo­ple and may help cor­rect any legal impli­ca­tions or deter­mi­na­tions on your part.

Thank you for your time and con­sid­er­a­tion, I will be for­ward­ing this mes­sage, and await your kind response, if you choose not to reply I will be under the belief and under­stand­ing that you are in agree­ment with my under­stand­ing and def­i­n­i­tion of the word FACTIONS as pro­vided above. [1–3]

Ben­jamin II,
Kanienke’haka; Ambassador-at-Large, and, at-Arms-Reach
Direc­tor of the Pen­tor­toise; Eval­u­a­tion of Admin­is­tra­tive Reg­u­la­tions and Liabilities

http://www.genocidewatch.org/aboutgenocide/8stagesofgenocide.html

Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Don’t pay attention to that man behind the curtain

Wizard_of_OZ___Emerald_City_by_marchine

wizard of ozToto, I have a feel­ing we’re not in Kansas anymore

The Wiz­ard of Oz: as extracted from ‘Crack­ing the Code’
Don’t pay atten­tion to that man behind the cur­tain — just fol­low that yel­low brick road and do as you are told!

WHOLESALE — To sell by whole­sale is to sell by large parcels, gen­er­ally in orig­i­nal pack­ages, and not by retail. Black’s Law Dic­tio­nary, 1st Edi­tion. Com­pare retail.

Note: The US gov­ern­ment acquired title to our birth cer­tifi­cates in whole­sale, or bulk pur­chase. Re the double-entry book­keep­ing sys­tem of the Depart­ment of the Trea­sury, whole­sale is the debit, or Pub­lic side, and retail is the credit, or pri­vate side.

WIZARD OF OZ, THE. Motion Pic­ture, 1939, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, book by L. Frank Baum; adap­ta­tion for the screen by Noël Lan­g­ley; screen­play by Noël Lan­g­ley, Flo­rence Ryer­son, and Edgar Allan Woolf; Lyrics by E.Y. Har­burg; Pro­duced by Mervyn LeRoy; Directed by Vic­tor Fleming.

Note: Just as you can read between the gory lines in the news­pa­per on any day and dis­cover clues issued by the Pow­ers That Be — if you look hard enough — as to what is actu­ally going on, such notice can also be found in lighter faire, like the movies. Such a movie was The Wiz­ard of Oz, an alle­gory for the new state of affairs in Amer­ica in the 1930’s fol­low­ing the stock mar­ket crash and fac­tual bank­ruptcy of the US Gov­ern­ment imme­di­ately there-after.

The set­ting was Kansas — Heart­land Amer­ica, and geo­graph­i­cal cen­ter of the USA. In comes the twister, the tor­nado, i.e. whirling, con­fu­sion — the stock mar­ket crash, theft of America’s: gold, US bank­ruptcy, the Great Depres­sion — and whisks Dorothy and Toto up into a new, arti­fi­cial dimen­sion some­where above the solid ground of Kansas. When they finally land in Oz, Dorothy com­ments to her lit­tle companion:

Toto, — I have a feel­ing we’re not in Kansas anymore.”

That’s right. After the bank­ruptcy, Kansas was no longer just “plain old Kansas”- it was now “KS,” an arti­fi­cial cor­po­rate venue of the bank­rupt United States, newly estab­lished “fed­eral ter­ri­tory,” part of the “Fed­eral Zone,” and Dorothy and Toto were “in this state” (see “in this state”).

In the 1930s, the all-capital letters-written (see all-capital letters-written) STRAWMAN (see straw­man), newly cre­ated arti­fi­cial aspect of the for­mer Amer­i­can sov­er­eigns, had no brain-and Amer­i­cans were too con­fused and dis­tracted by all the com­mo­tion to fig­ure out that they even had a straw­man. The Scare­crow iden­ti­fied his straw­man per­sona for Dorothy:

Some peo­ple with­out brains do an awful lot of talk­ing. Of course, I’m not bright, about doing things.”

And in his clas­sic song, “If I Only had a Brain,” the Scarecrow/Strawman suc­cinctly augured:

I’d unravel every rid­dle, For every ‘indi­vid­dle’, (see indi­vid­ual) In trou­ble, or in pain.“
Trans­la­tion: Once one dis­cov­ers that his straw man exists, all polit­i­cal and legal mys­ter­ies, com­plex­i­ties, and con­fu­sions are resolved-and once one takes title to his straw man, he can pro­tect him­self from any legal trou­ble or legal damage.

The Tin Man, or “T-I-N” (Tax­payer Iden­ti­fi­ca­tion Number-Man), was a hol­low man of metal, a “ves­sel,” or “vehi­cle” (see ves­sel, vehi­cle), newly cre­ated com­mer­cial code words for the straw man. Just like the Straw Man had no brain, this Tin Man ves­sel had no heart. Both were “arti­fi­cial per­sons” (see per­son). One of the def­i­n­i­tions of “tin” in Webster’s is “coun­ter­feit.” The Tin Man also rep­re­sented the mechan­i­cal and heart­less aspect of com­merce and com­mer­cial law. Just like they say in the Mafia: “Noth­ing per­sonal — it’s just busi­ness.” The heart­less Tin Man also car­ried an ax, tra­di­tional sym­bol for God — i.e. mod­ern com­mer­cial law — in most ear­lier dom­i­nant civ­i­liza­tions, includ­ing fas­cist states. In the words of the Tin Man, express­ing relief after Dorothy had oiled his arm:

I’ve held that ax up for ages”.

The word “Ace” is ety­mo­log­i­cally related to the word “ax,” and in a deck of cards the only one above the King is the Ace, i.e. God. One of the “Axis” pow­ers of World War II, Italy, was a fas­cist state. The sym­bol for fas­cism is the “fasces,” a bun­dle of rods with an ax bound up in the mid­dle and its blade pro­ject­ing. The fasces may be found on the reverse of the Amer­i­can Mercury-headed Dime (the Roman deity Mer­cury was the God of Com­merce), and on the wall behind, and on each side of, the Speaker’s podium in the US Sen­ate (each gold fasces is approx­i­mately six feet in height). At the base of the Seal of the US Sen­ate are two crossed fasces.

The Lion, “king of beasts,” or “king of ani­mals’ (some mem­bers of soci­ety regard you as noth­ing more than an ani­mal, prin­ci­pally “cat­tle”) – a den­i­gra­tion in itself – rep­re­sent­ing the once-fearless Amer­i­can peo­ple, had lost his courage. After your first round with the UCC-constituted IRS “defend­ing” your T-I-N man dummy cor­po­ra­tion vessel/vehicle, indi­vid­ual employee, pub­lic cor­po­ra­tion all-capital letters-written name, arti­fi­cial per­son straw man, you prob­a­bly lost some of your courage too. You don’t know it, but the IRS has been deal­ing with you strictly under the laws of com­merce. Just like the Tin Man, com­merce is heartless.

To find the Wiz­ard you had to “fol­low the yel­low brick road,” i.e. fol­low the trail of America’s stolen gold and you will find the thief who stole it. In the begin­ning of the movie the Wiz­ard was rep­re­sented by the trav­el­ing mys­tic, “Pro­fes­sor Mar­vel,” whom Dorothy encoun­tered when she ran away with Toto. His macabre shin­gle touted that he was “Acclaimed by the Crowned Heads of Europe, Past, Present and Future.” Boy, that Pro­fes­sor Mar­vel must have been a reg­u­lar wiz­ard to be acclaimed by the future crowned heads of Europe – before they were even crowned! Before the bankers stole Amer­ica, they had long since dis­em­pow­ered the Chris­t­ian Monar­chies of Europe and looted their king­doms. Maybe this “Pro­fes­sor Mar­vel” fel­low knew some­thing about the future that other folks didn’t. With a human skull peer­ing down from its painted perch above the door inside his wagon, the good Pro­fes­sor lec­tured Dorothy of the Priests of Isis and Osiris and the days of the Pharaohs of Egypt.

When Dorothy Gale and her new friends emerged from the for­est they were elated to see Emer­ald City before them, only a short jaunt away. The Wicked Witch of the West, des­per­ate for the Ruby Slip­pers that Dorothy was wear­ing, would have to make her move before our heroes were inside the walls. A sig­nif­i­cant point here is that in the orig­i­nal book, The Won­der­ful Wiz­ard of Oz, pub­lished in 1900, (39 years ear­lier), the Slip­pers were not ruby, or red, but sil­ver. At the time the book was writ­ten Amer­ica still had all its gold and sil­ver, and the value of one ounce of gold was set at 15 ounces of sil­ver — sil­ver being the more plen­ti­ful of the two met­als. Just as the Sil­ver Slip­pers car­ried Dorothy, America’s stock­pile of sil­ver and gold — back­ing the cur­rency — car­ried the coun­try to a posi­tion or pre-eminence through­out the world at the time. But, as men­tioned, when the movie came out in 1939 the Slip­pers were not sil­ver, but red.

Between 1916 and 1933, most of America’s gold was rounded up by the pri­vate Fed­eral Reserve Bank and shipped off to the Fed own­ers in Eng­land, Ger­many and France. The rea­son for this was that the use of Fed­eral Reserve Notes (FRN’s) car­ried an inter­est penalty that could only be paid in gold. Our pre­vi­ous cur­rency, United States Notes (USN’s), car­ried no such inter­est require­ment – but such was the bar­gain that came with the Fed­eral Reserve Notes. When bank­ruptcy was declared in 1933, Amer­i­cans were required to turn in all gold coin, gold bul­lion and gold cer­tifi­cates by May the 1st – May Day — the anniver­sary of the birth of Com­mu­nism in 1776. Talk­ing to peo­ple who were alive at the time, you may find out that the gen­eral sen­ti­ment toward such thiev­ery bor­dered on a sec­ond rev­o­lu­tion. Maybe it was just too much of a clue, or too much salt in the wound for Dorothy to be skip­ping down the “Yel­low Brick Road” in a pair of “Sil­ver Slip­pers” so, for what­ever rea­son, a color less likely to annoy or pro­voke was selected.

With regard to the choice of “Ruby,” or red–col­ored Slip­pers, one expla­na­tion is this: On doc­u­ments and the like, red is a very sig­nif­i­cant color. It sig­ni­fies “Pri­vate,” as opposed to “Pub­lic.” Your new Social Secu­rity Card has a red ser­ial num­ber on the reverse. The red Reg­is­tered Mail sticker says “United States Post Office Depart­ment” – all other mail is marked “United States Postal Ser­vice.” But no mat­ter their color in the Movie, the Wicked Witch of the West had big plans to get her hands on the Slip­pers before Dorothy and crew could make it to Emer­ald city.

Her tac­tic was to drug them all into uncon­scious­ness by cov­er­ing the coun­try­side with poppy flow­ers, or “pop­pies,” the source of heroin, opium and mor­phine, and then waltz in and snatch the Slip­pers. In other words, the best way to boost the gold was to some­how dull the senses of the Amer­i­can peo­ple (Note: LSD was cre­ated in 1939 by Dr. Albert Hoff­man). The poppies/drugs worked on Dorothy, the Lion and Toto, the flesh and blood enti­ties, but had no effect on the Scare­crow or the Tin Man, the arti­fi­cial enti­ties. The two of them cried out for help and Glenda, the Good Witch of the North, answered their prayers with a blan­ket of snow and nul­li­fied the nar­cotic effect of the pop­pies on Dorothy, the Lion and Toto.

As they scam­pered toward Emer­ald city — the city of green (Fed­eral Reserve Notes, the new fiat “money,” or “money by decree”), we heard The Munchkins singing on the glory of the Wizard’s creation:

You’re out of the woods,
You’re out of the dark,
You’re out of the night,
Step into the sun, step into the light,
Keep straight ahead for,
the most glo­ri­ous place on the face of the Earth or stars!

The fore­go­ing jin­gle abounds with Illuminist-Luciferian sym­bols and metaphors re; dark­ness and light.

The Wicked Witch of the West made her home in a round, medieval watch­tower, ancient sym­bol of the Knights Tem­plar of Freema­sonry, who are given to prac­tice witch­craft and also cred­ited as the orig­i­na­tors of mod­ern bank­ing, circa 1099 A.D. The Wicked Witch of the West was also dressed in black, the color sym­bol­iz­ing the planet Sat­urn, sacred icon of the Knights Tem­plar and the color of choice of judges and priests for their robes. Who was the Wicked Witch of the West? Remem­ber, in the first part of the film her coun­ter­part was “Almira Gulch,” who, accord­ing to Aunt Em, “owned half the county.” Miss Gulch alleged that Dorothy’s dog, Toto, had bit­ten her. She came to the farm with an “Order from the Sher­iff” demand­ing that they sur­ren­der Toto to her cus­tody. Aunt Em was not imme­di­ately co-operative, and answered Miss Gulch’s alle­ga­tions that Toto had bit­ten her.

He’s really gen­tle. With gen­tle peo­ple, that is.”
Could “gen­tle” really mean “Gen­tile”? (see Gen­tile) When Miss Gulch defied them to with­hold Toto and “go against the law,” dear old Aunt Em was rel­e­gated to “push­ing the Party line” for Big Brother. She duti­fully suc­cumbed to the pres­sure and coun­seled Dorothy reluctantly;

We can’t go against the law, Dorothy. I’m afraid poor Toto will have to go.”
When Dorothy refused to sur­ren­der Toto, Miss Gulch lashed out:

If you don’t hand over the dog I’ll bring a dam­age suit that’ll take your whole farm.”
Today 70% of all attor­neys in the world reside in the west – Amer­ica, to be exact – and 95% of all law­suits in the world are filed under US juris­dic­tion. The Wicked Witch of the West and Miss Gulch, my dear friends, rep­re­sent judges and attor­neys: i.e. the Amer­i­can legal sys­tem (includ­ing the attorney-run US Con­gress), exe­cu­tioner and pri­mary hench­men for trans­fer­ring all wealth in Amer­ica – every­thing – (And Aus­tralia and all other coun­tries – Ed.) from the peo­ple over to the banks and the gov­ern­ment (see Note at bar). The Wicked Witch of the West wanted the Sil­ver Slip­pers – the pre­cious met­als – and her coun­ter­part, Miss Gulch, wanted to take Toto. What does the word “Toto” mean in “attor­ney lan­guage,” i.e. Latin? “Everything!”

Dorothy and the gang fell for the Wizard’s illu­sion in the begin­ning, but soon wised up and dis­cov­ered the Wiz­ard for what he was: a con­fi­dence man. When asked about help­ing the Scarecrow/Straw man, among other bab­blings about “get­ting a brain” and “uni­ver­si­ties” the Wiz­ard also cited “the land of ’E Pluribus Unum,” which is Latin for “One out of many” i.e. con­vert­ing the many into one = New World Order, or Novus Ordo Seclo­rum, a Latin phrase placed on the Amer­i­can One Dol­lar Bill shortly after bank­ruptcy. He also proudly revealed/confessed that he was:

Born and brad in the heart of the West­ern wilder­ness, an old Kansas man myself!”
The bankers did pretty well in Europe, but as the Wiz­ard pointed out, they made a killing in the “West­ern wilder­ness,” with the theft of Amer­i­can gold, labor and prop­erty from the – quot­ing John D. Rock­e­feller – “grate­ful and respon­sive rural folk” who pop­u­lated the coun­try at the time.

When Dorothy asked Glenda, the Good Witch of the North (Santa Claus, Chris­tian­ity), for help in get­ting back to Kansas, Glenda replied:

You don’t need to be helped. You’ve always had the power to go back to Kansas.”
Trans­la­tion: you’ve always had the right and power to reclaim your sov­er­eignty, you just for­got. The actual act of reclaim­ing your sov­er­eignty – rem­edy (see rem­edy) – a sim­ple UCC-1 Form to the Sec­re­tary of State, and Invoice and Bill of Exchange to the Sec­re­tary of the Trea­sury, can be com­pleted from scratch in a few hours.

Amer­ica and Amer­i­cans have inti­mate first­hand knowl­edge of the heart­less mechan­ics of the laws of com­merce, reli­giously applied by the unreg­is­tered for­eign agents at the Inter­nal Rev­enue Ser­vice. The IRS, col­lec­tion agency for the pri­vate Fed­eral Reserve Bank, was con­sulted under the UCC in 1954 and has been oper­at­ing strictly in that realm ever since.

You may have won­dered what is the mean­ing behind the words in the title “The Wiz­ard of Oz.” Look them up in the dic­tio­nary. Like almost every­thing else, it’s right out there in the open for you to see if you will just look closely enough. One def­i­n­i­tion of “wiz­ard” is: “a per­son of high pro­fes­sional skill or knowl­edge.” “O-z” is an abbre­vi­a­tion of “onza,” o-n-z-a, the Ital­ian word for “ounce,’ or “ounces,” the unit of mea­sure­ment of gold, sil­ver and other pre­cious met­als. No mat­ter how large the quan­tity of gold or sil­ver being dis­cussed, the amount is always expressed in ounces. E.g. rather than “hun­dreds of tons” of gold, it’s “so many mil­lion ounces” of gold. As attested by the fac­tual his­tory of this coun­try: “The Wiz­ard of Oz.” was The Wiz­ard of Ounces.

Every­thing worked out for Dorothy, i.e. the Amer­i­can peo­ple, in the end and she “made it home.” Mean­ing: there is rem­edy in law (see rem­edy). It’s there – it was just encoded and dis­guised and cam­ou­flaged. For­tu­nately, the code has been cracked, and there is a way home, just like in the movie. Like Dorothy said, “There’s no place like home.” – and there isn’t! There’s noth­ing like sov­er­eignty for a sov­er­eign! (see note at vice-admiralty courts) We have com­mer­cial rem­edy in the Redemp­tion process. Will you con­tinue to be conned by the con­fi­dence men and wor­ship the Wizard’s light show, or will you wise up like Dorothy did and “look behind the scenes”?

In the com­men­tary above, each time you read the word, ”see”, the reader is being ref­er­enced to Black’s Law Dic­tio­nary 1st Edition.

Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Duality in Evolution

Evo­lu­tion is, in fact, not a thing in itself, but a pro­ce­dure of Nature, and is wholly gov­erned by the karmic causes orig­i­nated in pre­vi­ous peri­ods of the exis­tence of any evolv­ing entity what­so­ever. — G. de Purucker, H. P. Blavatsky: The Mys­tery, p. 150

Every­thing in nature is dual, and so is evo­lu­tion. I would like to share some thoughts with you about the evo­lu­tion of the cos­mos, par­tic­u­larly how the One becomes the many.

It is dif­fi­cult for the human mind to grasp that con­scious­ness, although essen­tially one, has dif­fer­en­ti­ated itself dur­ing the evo­lu­tion­ary process into innu­mer­able smaller cen­ters of con­scious­ness, some­times referred to as sparks or dewdrops.

Two well-known quo­ta­tions illus­trate this thought. Sir Edwin Arnold in his Light of Asia remarks that Gau­tama Bud­dha is like the dew­drop that “slips into the shin­ing sea” (Bk. 8).

Again, in Chap­ter 10 of the Bhagavad-Gita, Krishna says about him­self, “I estab­lished this whole uni­verse with a sin­gle por­tion of myself, and yet remain sep­a­rate.” G. de Purucker gives still another exam­ple in his Eso­teric Tra­di­tion:

man in his septem­par­tite or decem­par­tite con­sti­tu­tion [is] a hier­ar­chi­cal aggre­gate of hosts of beings over which the spirit of his con­sti­tu­tion pre­sides as the Hier­arch or Logos, remain­ing sep­a­rate and dis­tinct from its chil­dren which it emanates dur­ing each incar­na­tion; and yet these hosts of beings form in their aggre­gate man’s con­sti­tu­tion or the vehi­cle of his spirit. — p. 170

Now where does this dual evo­lu­tion begin? With THAT

An Omnipresent, Eter­nal, Bound­less, and Immutable Prin­ci­ple on which all spec­u­la­tion is impos­si­ble, since it tran­scends the power of human con­cep­tion and could only be dwarfed by any human expres­sion or simil­i­tude. — H. P. Blavatsky, The Secret Doc­trine 1:14

This eter­nal Prin­ci­ple forms the first fun­da­men­tal propo­si­tion of the mod­ern pre­sen­ta­tion of theos­o­phy. Look­ing at the sec­ond propo­si­tion, we find the uni­ver­sal law of periodicity:

But once that we pass in thought from this (to us) Absolute Nega­tion, dual­ity super­venes in the con­trast of Spirit (or con­scious­ness) and Mat­ter, Sub­ject and Object. — 1:15

Dual­ity, then, is basic to man­i­fes­ta­tion itself.

The high­est duad the human mind can con­ceive of is called in Hindu phi­los­o­phy  Parabrah­man (beyond Brah­man) and Mulaprakriti (root-nature), the cos­mic veil of Parabrahman.

A sec­ond duad emanates from the first one: Brah­man and Prad­hana. Brah­man is the first or unman­i­fested Logos, the active or divine side of evo­lu­tion, while Prad­hana is its veil or pas­sive oppo­site pole.

From Brah­man and Prad­hana is born the son, Brahma, a name which comes from a San­skrit root mean­ing “expan­sion.” He rep­re­sents the spir­i­tual energy-consciousness aspect of our solar sys­tem, its active pole.

The gar­ments of Brahma, his illu­sory, mate­r­ial man­i­fes­ta­tions or phe­nom­ena, emanate from his pas­sive oppo­site pole, Prakriti. Although at the point here described the phys­i­cal man­i­fes­ta­tion of our solar sys­tem has not yet begun, three evo­lu­tion­ary phases of a dual char­ac­ter have already occurred.

Two lines of evo­lu­tion can be observed, a sub­jec­tive and an objec­tive one: Parabrahman-Brahman-Brahma as the sub­jec­tive line; and Mulaprakriti-Pradhana-Prakriti as the objec­tive line.

With the appear­ance of Brahma, the first “day” of his life begins, a period which lasts 100 divine years. Accord­ing to Brah­man­i­cal cal­cu­la­tions, Brahma’s life lasts 4,320 mil­lion x 36,000 x 2 years — quite a long time! Yet all is rel­a­tive, as HPB explains: “The Eter­nity of the Uni­verse … [is] peri­od­i­cally ‘the play­ground of num­ber­less Uni­verses inces­santly man­i­fest­ing and dis­ap­pear­ing,’ … ‘The Eter­nity of the Pil­grim’ is like a wink of the Eye of Self–Exis­tence” (Ibid. 1:16–17).

There­after Brahma con­tin­ues its dual evo­lu­tion. How can we describe this process of the com­ing into being of Brahma’s gar­ment — our home, our solar gar­ment? G. de Purucker writes in Fountain-Source of Occultism:

Our solar sys­tem began in Space, in the womb of Aditi, the Eter­nal Mother, as a neb­ula — not by chance, but as one of the stages in its new imbod­i­ment. As this neb­ula slowly moved in space, at its heart there began to be a con­den­sa­tion of its sub­stance. This con­den­sa­tion became the sun, and a lit­tle later at var­i­ous points within that neb­ula sim­i­lar but smaller con­den­sa­tions of the neb­u­lar mate­r­ial occurred, and these became the plan­ets. — p. 118

But who or what stands behind all this? Which cos­mic intel­li­gences plan and build up this uni­verse? They are the archi­tects and builders, to use the mod­ern theo­soph­i­cal terms for such cos­mic beings. Speak­ing of these beings, HPB says:

In every Cos­mogony, behind and higher than the cre­ative deity, there is a supe­rior deity, a plan­ner, an Archi­tect, of whom the Cre­ator is but the exec­u­tive agent. And still higher, overand aroundwithin and with­out, there is the unknow­able and the unknown, the Source and Cause of all these Ema­na­tions. – The Secret Doc­trine 2:43

Purucker says further:

Every uni­tary being within nature, such as a sun or a planet, is in con­se­quence an imbod­ied entity, divine in its high­est parts, spir­i­tual in the part sub­or­di­nate to the divine, hav­ing an intel­lec­tual essence or mind, and all these man­i­fest­ing through the lower gar­ments, includ­ing the phys­i­cal body. – Fountain-Source of Occultism, p. 209

Human under­stand­ing divides the man­i­fested uni­verse into two inter­de­pend­ing parts: the light–side, the spir­i­tual or divine side of nature; and the matter-side, the vehic­u­lar aspect. The light–side is rep­re­sented by the archi­tects and the matter-side by the builders.

In real­ity it is almost impos­si­ble to mark a divid­ing line between the two: both are built up by hosts of cos­mic mon­ads which dif­fer only in their degree of devel­op­ment, and at the tran­si­tion point they are vir­tu­ally identical.

H. P. Blavatsky divided these mon­ads into two par­al­lel tri­ads: the light triad con­sist­ing of gods-monads-atoms; and the vehic­u­lar triad con­sist­ing of chaos-theos-cosmos. When these two tri­ads unite, the gods work in chaos, the mon­ads in theos, and the atoms in cosmos.

Con­sid­er­ing each triad indi­vid­u­ally, we see that on the spir­i­tual side the gods work through the mon­ads, and the mon­ads work through the atoms; while on the mate­r­ial side, chaos works in theos and theos works in cosmos.

We can apply this cos­mic pat­tern to the human con­sti­tu­tion, for in human evo­lu­tion there are also two lines and three stages. The two lines can be called the spir­i­tual and the mate­r­ial. The three stages of evo­lu­tion are the monadic, the intel­lec­tual, and the phys­i­cal, and they work together simul­ta­ne­ously. Refer­ring to the sev­en­fold human con­sti­tu­tion, we have:

1. Atman and bud­dhi (the higher duad), the first stage;

2. Manas and kama (the mid­dle duad), the sec­ond stage;

3. Prana, the astral body, and the phys­i­cal body (the lower triad), the third stage.

The prin­ci­ples of our con­sti­tu­tion are insep­a­ra­bly inter­wo­ven and inter­min­gled, espe­cially because human­ity belongs to a class of monadic beings where spirit and mat­ter are more or less in balance.

How­ever, all such clas­si­fi­ca­tions are, in my view, sim­ply arti­fi­cial intel­lec­tual cre­ations which have value only as work­ing hypothe­ses when we are try­ing to under­stand the man­i­fested cos­mos. They have no inde­pen­dent reality.

The process of dual evo­lu­tion is beau­ti­fully explained by the term sutrat­man:

It is this sutrat­man, this thread–self, this consciousness-stream, or rather stream of consciousness-life, which is the fun­da­men­tal and indi­vid­ual Self­hood of every entity, and which, reflected in and through the sev­eral inter­me­di­ate vehi­cles or veils or sheaths or gar­ments of the invis­i­ble con­sti­tu­tion of man, or of any other being in which a monad enshrouds itself, pro­duces the ego cen­ters of self–con­scious exis­tence. — G. de Purucker, Occult Glos­sary

By reflect­ing on the role of dual­ity in the evo­lu­tion­ary process, we can get at least a basic idea of the way in which the One becomes the many, an event in which we all take part. In apply­ing it to our­selves, we may sub­sti­tute the words “uni­ver­sal broth­er­hood” for the One.

Cycli­cally a spe­cial effort is made to bring home to mankind this sub­lime fact of uni­ver­sal nature. In the begin­ning only a few are ready to accept uni­ver­sal broth­er­hood, but nonethe­less the idea starts to spread. As a seed grad­u­ally grows into an organ­ism, so the idea of broth­er­hood becomes a move­ment — in our time it is called the Theo­soph­i­cal movement.

Although the broth­er­hood ideal is the cre­ator and sup­porter of the move­ment, it is not affected by the movement’s fate: move­ments come and go, but uni­ver­sal broth­er­hood, our essen­tial one­ness, was, is, and ever will be.

Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

THE PEACEFUL WARRIOR

1249518083343

A war­rior lives by act­ing, not by think­ing about act­ing, nor by think­ing about what he will think when he has fin­ished acting.

When­ever a war­rior decides to do some­thing, he must go all the way. But, he must take respon­si­bil­ity for what he does. No mat­ter what he does, he must know first why he is doing it, and then he must pro­ceed with his actions with­out hav­ing doubts or remorse about them.

A war­rior takes respon­si­bil­ity for his acts; for the most triv­ial of his acts. An aver­age man acts out his thoughts and never takes respon­si­bil­ity for what he does.

There is no empti­ness in the life of a war­rior. Every­thing is filled to the brim. Every­thing is filled to the brim and every­thing is equal.

A war­rior goes to knowl­edge as he goes to war; wide-awake, with fear, with respect, and with absolute-assurance. Going to knowl­edge or going to war in any other man­ner is a mis­take, and who­ever makes it might never live to regret it. —- When a man has ful­filled all four of these req­ui­sites – to be awake, to have fear, respect, and absolute-assurance – there are no mis­takes for which he will have to account, under such con­di­tions his actions lose the blun­der­ing qual­ity of the acts of a fool. If such a man fails, or suf­fers defeat, he will have only lost a bat­tle, and there will be no piti­ful regrets over that.

Dwelling upon the self too much pro­duces a ter­ri­ble fatigue. A man in that posi­tion is deaf and blind to every­thing else. The fatigue, itself, makes him cease to see the mar­vels all around him.

To be angry at peo­ple means that one con­sid­ers their acts to be (too) impor­tant. It is imper­a­tive to cease to feel that way. The acts of men can­not be impor­tant enough to off­set our only viable alter­na­tive: our unchange­able encounter with infinity.

The things that peo­ple do can­not, under any con­di­tions, be more impor­tant than what they are or more impor­tant than the world. And thus, a war­rior treats the world and peo­ple as an end­less mys­tery; and what peo­ple do as an end­less folly.

Any­thing is one of a mil­lion paths. There­fore, a war­rior must always keep in mind that a path is only a path; if he feels that he should not fol­low it, he must not stay with it under any con­di­tions. His deci­sion to keep on that path or to leave must be free of fear or ambi­tion. He must look at every path closely and delib­er­ately. There is a ques­tion that a war­rior must ask, manda­to­rily: Does this path have a heart? – All paths are the same; they lead to now’here. How­ever, a path with­out heart is never enjoy­able, nor can it pre­pare one for the encounter with infin­ity. On the other hand, a path with heart is easy – it does make a war­rior work with all his might, but it does not make a war­rior work a lik­ing it. It makes for a joy­ful jour­ney; and as long as a man fol­lows it, he is one with it.

There is world of hap­pi­ness where there is no dif­fer­ence between things because there is no one to ask about the dif­fer­ence. But, that is not the world of men. Some men have the van­ity to believe that they live in two worlds, but it is only their van­ity. There is but one sin­gle world for us. We are men, and must fol­low, for now, the world of men contentedly.

A man has four nat­ural ene­mies; fear, clar­ity, power, and old age. Fear, clar­ity, and power can be over­come, but not old age. Its effects can be post­poned, but it can never be overcome.

A war­rior knows that he is only a man. His only regret is that his life is so short that he can’t grab onto all the things that he would like to. But for him, this is not an issue; it is only a pity.

Feel­ing impor­tant makes one heavy, clumsy, and vain. To be a war­rior, one needs to be light and fluid.

The most effec­tive way to live is as a war­rior. A war­rior may worry and think before mak­ing a deci­sion, but once he makes it, he goes on his way; free from wor­ries or thoughts. There will be a mil­lion other deci­sions still await­ing him. That is the warrior’s way.

A war­rior thinks of his death when things become unclear. The idea of death is the only thing that tem­pers our spirit.

A war­rior must know that his acts are use­less, and yet, he must pro­ceed as if he didn’t know it. This is a warrior’s con­trolled folly. [Like Solomon’s vanity]

The aver­age man is either vic­to­ri­ous or defeated and, depend­ing on that, he becomes a per­se­cu­tor or a vic­tim. These two con­di­tions are preva­lent as long as one does not “see”. See­ing dis­pels the illu­sion of vic­tory, defeat, or suffering.

When a man embarks on the war­riors’ path, he becomes aware, in a grad­ual man­ner, that ordi­nary life has been left for­ever behind. The means of the ordi­nary world are no longer a buffer for him; and he must adopt a new way of life if he is going to survive.

Only the idea of death makes a war­rior suf­fi­ciently detached so that he is capa­ble of aban­don­ing him­self to any­thing. He knows his death is stalk­ing him and won’t give him time to cling to any­thing. So he tries, with­out crav­ing, all of everything.

The spirit of a war­rior is not geared to indulging and com­plain­ing, nor is it geared to win­ning or los­ing. The spirit of a war­rior is geared only to strug­gle, and every strug­gle is a warrior’s last bat­tle on earth. Thus the out­come mat­ters there lit­tle to him. In his last bat­tle on earth, a war­rior lets his spirit flow free and clear. And as he wages bat­tle, know­ing that his intent is impec­ca­ble, the war­rior laughs and laughs.

When noth­ing is for sure, we remain alert, peren­ni­ally on our toes. It is more excit­ing not to know which bush the rab­bit is hid­ing behind, than to behave as though we know every­thing. Other than his death, the war­rior knows that noth­ing on this earth is for sure.

Every time a man sets him­self to learn, he has to labor as hard as any­one can. The lim­its of his learn­ing are deter­mined by his own nature. Fear of knowl­edge is nat­ural; all of us expe­ri­ence it, and there is noth­ing we can do about it. But no mat­ter how fright­en­ing learn­ing is, it is more ter­ri­ble to think of a man with­out knowledge.

We hardly real­ize that we can cut any­thing out of our lives; any­time; in the blink of an eye.

As long as a man feels that he is the most impor­tant thing in the world, he can­not appre­ci­ate the world around him. He is like a horse with blind­ers; all he sees is him­self and he is apart from every­thing else.

In a world where death is the hunter, there is not time for regrets or doubts. There is only time for deci­sions. It doesn’t mat­ter what the deci­sions are. Noth­ing could be more or less seri­ous than any­thing else. In a world where death is the hunter, there are no small or big deci­sions. There are only deci­sions that a war­rior makes in the face of his inevitable death.

Once a man wor­ries, he clings to any­thing out of des­per­a­tion; and once he clings, he is bound to get exhausted or to exhaust whomever or what­ever he is cling­ing to.

For an aver­age man, the world is weird because if he is not bored with it; he is at odds with it. For a war­rior, the world is weird because it is stu­pen­dous, awe­some, mys­te­ri­ous, and unfath­omable. A war­rior must assume respon­si­bil­ity for being here; in this mar­velous place, in this mar­velous time.

A war­rior must focus his atten­tion on the link between him­self and his death. With­out remorse, sad­ness or wor­ry­ing. He must focus his atten­tion on the fact that he does not have time and let his acts flow accord­ingly. He must let each of his acts be his last bat­tle on earth. Only under these con­di­tions will his acts have their right­ful power. Oth­er­wise all actions will be, for as long as a man lives, the acts of a fool.

A man; any man, deserves every­thing that is a man’s lot – joy, pain, sad­ness, and strug­gle. The nature of his acts is unim­por­tant as long as he acts as a war­rior. — If his spirit is dis­torted he should sim­ply fix it – purge it, make it per­fect – because there is no other task in our entire lives, which is more worth­while. Not to fix the spirit is to seek death, and that is the same thing as to seek noth­ing, since death is going to over­take us regard­less of any­thing. To seek to per­fec­tion of the warrior’s spirit is the only task wor­thy of our tem­po­rari­ness and our manhood.

The hard­est thing in the world is to assume the mood of a war­rior. It is of no use to be sad and com­plain and feel jus­ti­fied in doing so, believ­ing that some­one is always doing some­thing to us. Nobody is doing any­thing to any­one, much less to a warrior.

A war­rior is a hunter. He cal­cu­lates every­thing. That’s con­trol. Once his cal­cu­la­tions are over, he acts. He lets go. That’s aban­don. A war­rior is not a leaf at the mercy of the wind. No one can push him; no one can make him do things against him­self or against his bet­ter judg­ment. A war­rior is tuned to sur­vive; and he sur­vives in the best of all pos­si­ble fashions.

A war­rior is only a man, a hum­ble man. He can­not change the designs of his death. But, his impec­ca­ble spirit, which has stored power after stu­pen­dous hard­ships, can cer­tainly hold his death for a moment; a moment long enough to let him rejoice for the last time in recall­ing his power. We may say that this is a ges­ture which death has with those who have an impec­ca­ble spirit.

A war­rior doesn’t hold to remorse or place unwar­ranted impor­tance on the self or too much empha­sis on his acts. The trick is what one empha­sizes. We either make our­selves mis­er­able or we make our­selves strong. The amount of work is the same.

The self-confidence of the war­rior is not the self-confidence of the aver­age man. The aver­age man seeks cer­tainty in the eyes of the onlooker and calls that self-confidence. The war­rior seeks impec­ca­bil­ity and calls that hum­ble­ness. The aver­age man is hooked to his fel­low men, while the war­rior is hooked only to infinity.

The inter­nal dia­logue is what grounds peo­ple is their daily world. The world is such and such, or so and so; only because we talk to our­selves about its being such and such, or so and so. The pas­sage­way into the world of the war­rior opens up after a man has learned to shut off his inter­nal dia­logue. When­ever the war­rior learns to stop the inter­nal dia­logue, every­thing becomes pos­si­ble; the most far-fetched schemes become attainable.

The hum­ble­ness of a war­rior is not the hum­ble­ness of a beg­gar. The war­rior low­ers his head to no one, but at the same time, he doesn’t per­mit any­one to lower his head to him. The beg­gar, on the other hand, falls to his knees at the drop of a hat and scrapes the floor for any­one he deems to be higher; but at the same time, he demands that some­one lower than him, scrape the floor for him.

The flaw with words is that they always make us feel enlight­ened, but when we turn and face the world, they always fail us and we end up fac­ing the world as we always have, with­out enlight­en­ment. For this rea­son a war­rior seeks to act rather than to talk, and to this effect, he gets a new descrip­tion of the world—a new descrip­tion where talk­ing is not that impor­tant and where new acts have new reflections.

Knowl­edge is a most pecu­liar affair, espe­cially for a war­rior. Knowl­edge for a war­rior is some­thing that comes at once, engulfs him and passes on. Knowl­edge comes to a war­rior, float­ing; like the dust that cover the wings of a moth. So, for a war­rior, knowl­edge is like tak­ing a shower, or being rained on by specks of gold dust.

The world is unfath­omable. And so are we, and so is every being that exists in this world.

A war­rior must cul­ti­vate the feel­ing that he has every­thing needed for the extrav­a­gant jour­ney that is his life. What counts for a war­rior is being alive. Life in itself is suf­fi­cient, self-explanatory and com­plete. There­fore, one may say with­out being pre­sump­tu­ous that the expe­ri­ence of expe­ri­ences is being alive.

War­riors do not win vic­to­ries by beat­ing their heads against walls, but over­tak­ing the walls. War­riors jump over walls; they do not demol­ish them.

An aver­age man thinks that indulging in doubts and tribu­la­tions is the sign of sen­si­tiv­ity and spir­i­tu­al­ity. The truth of the mat­ter is that the aver­age man is the far­thest thing imag­in­able from being sen­si­tive or spir­i­tual. His puny rea­son delib­er­ately makes itself into a mon­ster or a saint, but he is truth­fully too small for such a big mon­ster or saint role.

To be a war­rior is not a sim­ple mat­ter of wish­ing to be one. It is rather an end­less strug­gle that will go on to the very last moment of our lives. Nobody is born a war­rior; in exactly the same way that nobody is born an aver­age man. We make our­selves into one or the other.

Human beings are per­ceivers, but the world that they per­ceive is an illu­sion; an illu­sion cre­ated by the descrip­tion that was told to them from the moment that they were born. In essence, the world that their rea­son wants to sus­tain is the world cre­ated by a descrip­tion and it dog­matic and invi­o­lable rules… which their rea­son learns to accept and defend. Their rea­son makes them for­get that a descrip­tion is only a descrip­tion, and before they real­ize it, human beings have entrapped the total­ity of them­selves in a vicious cir­cle from which they rarely emerge in their lifetimes.

Only as a war­rior can one with­stand the path of knowl­edge. A war­rior can­not com­plain or regret any­thing. His life is an end­less chal­lenge, and chal­lenges can­not pos­si­bly be good or bad. Chal­lenges are sim­ply challenges.

The basic dif­fer­ence between a war­rior and an ordi­nary man is that a war­rior takes every­thing as a chal­lenge, while an aver­age man takes every­thing as a bless­ing or a curse.

When one has noth­ing to lose, one becomes coura­geous. We are timid only when there is some­thing we can still cling to.

Any habit needs all of its parts in order to func­tion. If some parts are miss­ing, the habit is disassembled.

Human beings love to be told what to do, but they love even more to fight and not to do what they are told, and thus they get entan­gled in hat­ing the one who told them in the first place.

The warrior’s way offers a man a new life and that life has to be com­pletely new. He can’t bring to that life his ugly old ways. The only free­dom that war­riors have is to behave impec­ca­bly. Not only does impec­ca­bil­ity carry with it free­dom; it is the only way to straighten out the human form.

People’s actions no longer affect a war­rior when he has no more expec­ta­tions of any kind. A strange peace becomes the rul­ing force of his life. The course of a warrior’s des­tiny is unal­ter­able. The chal­lenge is how far he can go and how impec­ca­ble he can be within those rigid bounds. A warrior’s ulti­mate accom­plish­ment is to enjoy the joy of infinity.

A war­rior is never under siege. To be under siege implies that one has per­sonal pos­ses­sions that could be block­aded. A war­rior has noth­ing in the world except his impec­ca­bil­ity;… and impec­ca­bil­ity can­not be threatened.

A chief prin­ci­ple of the warrior’s art is the prin­ci­ple that a war­rior always chooses his bat­tle­ground. A war­rior never goes into bat­tle with­out know­ing what the sur­round­ings are. A war­rior relaxes and aban­dons him­self, he fears noth­ing. Only then will the power that is avail­able to guide him open the road for the war­rior and aid him. Only then.

War­riors com­press time; this is another prin­ci­ple of the warrior’s art. Even an instant counts. In a bat­tle for your life, a sec­ond is an eter­nity, an eter­nity that may decide the out­come. War­riors aim at suc­ceed­ing, there­fore they com­press time. War­riors don’t waste an instant.

Apply­ing all the prin­ci­ples of the warrior’s art brings about three results. The first is that war­riors learn never to take them­selves seri­ously; they learn to laugh at them­selves. If they are not afraid of being a fool, they can fool any­one. The sec­ond is that war­riors learn to have end­less patience. War­riors are never in a hurry; they never fret. And the third is that war­riors learn to have an end­less capac­ity to improvise.

Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Calibrating by Shifting your Emotions

emotions

Emo­tions

Can you recall the last time you were really angry at some­one? So much so that you were phys­i­cally shaken just at the thought of them? Rarely does this feel­ing of anger help us in get­ting what we want. Often, it will work against us, result­ing in more pain, unnecessarily.

Even the most gen­tle of per­son­al­i­ties can tem­porar­ily turn into a vin­dic­tive ras­cal, if pushed far enough.

A friend of mine is going through a divorce with a spouse who is unrea­son­ably pro­long­ing the process. He’s sad, hurt, upset, frus­trated and very, very angry. Words of anger and hatred spout out of his — oth­er­wise polite and thought­ful — mouth. He was no longer his authen­tic and peace­ful self. And he didn’t like who he was becoming.

Through help­ing him come to a place of under­stand­ing and for­give­ness of his ex-spouse with love, com­pas­sion and humil­ity (we had to dig deep), I real­ized that the same tools can be used in deal­ing with other neg­a­tive emotions.

For sake of sim­plic­ity, we will use anger as the tar­get emo­tion to over­come. Keep in mind that it can be applied to over­come other non-conducive and intense emo­tions such as jeal­ousy, guilt, hatred, regret and fear.

Why Do We Feel Like Crap?

“It’s amaz­ing how much emo­tion
a lit­tle men­tal con­cept like ‘my’ can gen­er­ate.“

– Eck­hart Tolle

Anger doesn’t feel very good. It’s pretty gross, actu­ally. Our stom­ach tightens-up, we become sweaty, we react — instead of act — in sur­vival mode. And anger clouds our judg­ment caus­ing us to respond wildly out of emo­tion. We’ve all been there. Some­times, it can get so intense that we trem­ble pas­sion­ately while feel­ing strong hate towards other peo­ple. And when we cool down, we would won­der how we allowed our­selves to get in such a messed up state in the first place.

The answer is: Very eas­ily. Allow me to explain.

Emo­tion is our body’s response to a thought, which could be trig­gered by an exter­nal sit­u­a­tion. But this sit­u­a­tion is seen through the lens of our own inter­pre­ta­tion. Our lens is col­ored by the men­tal con­cepts unique to each of us; con­cepts like good and bad, mine and yours, like and dis­like, right and wrong. Keep in mind we all have dif­fer­ent lenses, thus inter­pre­ta­tion con­flicts are inevitable.

For exam­ple, we feel very lit­tle emo­tion when some­one else loses their wal­let. But when it is our own money, we sud­denly feel pain and the desire to hoard it back to us.

The moment we’ve labeled some­thing as “mine”, we will expe­ri­ence men­tal dis­tress when we’ve inter­preted that we have ‘lost’ it or are at the risk of los­ing it. Whether it is my wal­let, my pride, my money, my house, my car, my job, my child, my stocks, my feel­ings or my dog, as long as we feel that it is lost or threat­ened, we will expe­ri­ence pain in the form of anger or other strong neg­a­tive emotions.

We expe­ri­ence pain, because we have been trained since chil­dren to believe that the things which we have labeled as ‘mine’, are some­thing that define who we are. We’ve iden­ti­fied with it and falsely believed that if we lost it, or face los­ing it, we lose our­selves. Sud­denly, our ego has noth­ing to iden­tify itself by. Who are we? This hurts our ego tremendously.

In our minds, we feel enti­tled to more, whether it is more money, or more respect, or a bet­ter job, or a larger house. Amongst it all, we fail to see that our mind will always want more. Greed is a highly addic­tive state of mind, always grow­ing, blind­ing us of real­ity, while con­vinc­ing us that we’re doing a rea­son­able thing.

Com­mon Ingre­di­ents of Anger:

* Unfair­ness — We believe that we have been treated unfairly. We tell our­selves that we deserve more, and we buy into this story that some­one has wronged us.

* Lost — We feel that we have lost some­thing that we have iden­ti­fied our­selves with. Feel­ings, pride, money, car, job.

* Blame — We blame other peo­ple or exter­nal sit­u­a­tions for hav­ing caused our loss, for tak­ing advan­tage of us unfairly. The blame often only resides in our heads and is a prod­uct of our imag­i­na­tion. We fail to see things from other people’s per­spec­tives. We become deeply selfish.

* Pain — We expe­ri­ence pain, men­tal dis­tress, and anx­i­ety. The pain causes phys­i­cal responses in our body, which dis­turbs our nat­ural energy flow and state of wellbeing.

* Focus — We focus on the thing we don’t want, and ener­gize it by com­plain­ing about it pas­sion­ately, and repeat­ing it to as many peo­ple who will lis­ten. This cre­ates a down­ward spi­ral of anger. “What we focus on expands”, this is true regard­less of the emotion.

The inter­est­ing thing is that if there are two angry peo­ple unhappy with each other, both peo­ple feel a sense of loss, unfair­ness, pain and the need to blame the other per­son. Who is right? The answer is: both are right and both are wrong.

Why Should We Bother with Over­com­ing Anger?

Neg­a­tive emo­tions like anger kick us into sur­vival mode, as if say­ing to our body, “we are in dan­ger”. There is a phys­i­o­log­i­cal change that takes place in our body to pre­pare us for fight or flight. These phys­i­cal responses dis­rupt the nat­ural flow of energy in our body — affect­ing our heart, immune sys­tem, diges­tion and hor­mone pro­duc­tion. A neg­a­tive emo­tion is there­fore toxic to the body and inter­feres with its har­mo­nious func­tion­ing and balance.

Pro­longed anger, stress and hold­ing grudges will hurt our adrenal gland and immune sys­tem. For women, stress on the adrenal gland can affect the repro­duc­tive organs (uterus, ovaries) caus­ing them to exhibit abnor­mal behav­iors, poten­tially result­ing in sterility.

Aren’t your phys­i­cal and men­tal health worth more than the men­tal pres­sure you are vol­un­tar­ily pil­ing onto your­self? Is it worth it to react out of spite­ful emo­tions and hurt feel­ings, so that we might tem­porar­ily sat­isfy our pride?

Anger also clouds our judg­ment and we become con­sumed with prob­lems and pain. Instead of cut­ting our­selves loose, free from the self-inflicted pain; we make irra­tional, unrea­son­able, regret­ful and hurt­ful deci­sions. In the case of divorces, the legal fees alone can drain one’s sav­ings, unnec­es­sar­ily leav­ing both par­ties unhappy and poor. Nobody wins!

The Fun­da­men­tals of Change

Notice how quickly we can fall into a neg­a­tive state of being? A split sec­ond, maybe. By the same rea­son­ing it should take us the same amount of time to shift into a resource­ful state of being. The chal­lenge here is that we have been con­di­tioned from a very young age to remain in an un-resourceful state. Nobody gave us the tools to shift our state into a pos­i­tive one. Often, our par­ents didn’t know how, and still do not know how.

When neg­a­tive feel­ings arise, we have two choices,

1. To fol­low the habit­ual pat­tern we’ve learned since we were young, to react and allow the neg­a­tiv­ity to con­sume us.

2. Or, to inter­rupt the pat­tern we have been con­di­tioned to fol­low, and in doing so build new neural path­ways that allows for alter­na­tive possibilities.

There are essen­tially three ways to inter­rupt a behav­ioral pattern:

* Visual — Change your thoughts.
* Ver­bal — Change your lan­guage.
* Kines­thetic — Change your phys­i­cal position.

Okay, let’s dive into the prac­ti­cal stuff…

15 Ways to Over­come Anger

Some of these tools might be more effec­tive for some of us than oth­ers. For me, “Look Up!!” has been the most effec­tive (thus, I’m list­ing it first). I’ve also seen good results where sev­eral of these are used in combination.

1. Look Up!!!

The fastest way to change neg­a­tive feel­ings is by chang­ing our phys­i­cal posi­tion right away. The eas­i­est way to phys­i­cally change is by mov­ing our eye posi­tion. When we are in a neg­a­tive state, we are likely look­ing down. Sud­denly look­ing up (into our visual plane) will inter­rupt the neg­a­tive pat­terns of sink­ing into the quick sand of bad feelings.

Any sud­den phys­i­cal change will do the trick:

* Stand up and stretch while let­ting out an audi­ble sigh.
* Exag­ger­ate and change your facial expres­sions.
* Walk over to a win­dow where there is sun­light.
* Do 10 jump­ing jacks.
* Do a ridicu­lous dance that pokes fun at you.
* Mas­sage the back of your neck with one hand while singing happy birthday.

Try this next time you feel a neg­a­tive or unpleas­ant thought come up.

2. “What Do You Want?”

Sit down and write down exactly what it is that you want out of the cur­rent sit­u­a­tion. Your job is to describe the end result you would like to see. Be clear, real­is­tic and fair. Be spe­cific with your descrip­tion. Includ­ing dates of when you would like to see the results.

Once you have this clearly mapped out, and when you find your­self drift­ing into neg­a­tive thoughts of what you don’t want, you can shift your focus on this list instead.

Also, when we do this exer­cise con­sciously, we’ll come to find that the arbi­trary and mate­ri­al­is­tic things that we thought we wanted, aren’t want we want, after all. Clar­ity is a beau­ti­ful thing.

3. Elim­i­nate: Don’t, Not, No

Words such as Don’t, Not, No, Can’t gets us focused on the things that we don’t want. Lan­guage is a pow­er­ful thing and can influ­ence our sub­con­scious mind, and ulti­mately our feel­ings. When you catch your­self using a negated word, see if you can replace it with another word of oppos­ing mean­ing. Exam­ple: instead of say­ing “I don’t want war”, say “I want peace”.

4. Find­ing the Light

Dark­ness can only be elim­i­nated when there is light (like a lamp, or sun­light). In the same way, neg­a­tive things can only be replaced by pos­i­tive things. Remem­ber that regard­less of what is hap­pen­ing to us exter­nally, or how bad things appear in our mind, we always have the choice to speak and see things positively.

I know this is harder to do when you’re in midst of heated emo­tions, but I’m a big believer that there is some­thing to be learned from every sit­u­a­tion we encounter. Look for the les­son. Find some­thing about the sit­u­a­tion that you’ve gained, whether it’s a mate­r­ial pos­ses­sion or an under­stand­ing or a per­sonal growth. Find the light so you can uncover the dark­ness of your mind.

5. Surrender

Sur­ren­der to our ego’s need to be right, to blame, to be spite­ful, and to be revenge­ful. Sur­ren­der to the moment. Sur­ren­der to the pull to become worked-up by the situation.

Become mind­ful. Watch your thoughts and learn to sep­a­rate your thoughts from your own iden­tity. Your thoughts are not you.

Things will play out regard­less of whether we become emo­tional or not. Trust that the uni­verse will work its course and do its job. By not sur­ren­der­ing, we get worked up for noth­ing, and our body will suf­fer as a result of it.

6. Cir­cle of Influence

When we are feel­ing down, it’s easy to be sucked into the down­ward spi­ral of bad feel­ings. It really doesn’t help to be around oth­ers com­plain­ing about the same issues. It’s counter-productive to get­ting well.

Instead, find a group of peo­ple with a pos­i­tive out­look. When we are around such a group of peo­ple, they will remind us of things we already know deep within us, we can start to rec­og­nize the good, and the pos­i­tives. When we are down, we can draw energy from them in order to rise above the prob­lem and neg­a­tive state.

In the same way that being around neg­a­tive peo­ple can affect you in a neg­a­tive way, being around happy and opti­mistic peo­ple can raise our aware­ness, and help us move out of the un-resourceful state.

7. Grat­i­tude Exercise

Find an unin­ter­rupted space, and bring a notepad and pen with you. List out (in as much detail) every­thing you are grate­ful for in your life, either in the past, or present; either expe­ri­ences, rela­tion­ships, friend­ships, oppor­tu­ni­ties or mate­r­ial pos­ses­sions. Fill up the page, and use as many pages as you have things to be thank­ful for. Be sure to thank your heart and your body.

This is a sim­ple, yet under­es­ti­mated tool to help us focus our atten­tion on what mat­ters. This exer­cise can also shift our state of mind from one of a lower fre­quency to that of a higher fre­quency. It also helps us to gain clar­ity and to remind our­selves that we have much to be thank­ful for.

No mat­ter how bad things get, we always, always have things to be grate­ful for. If any­thing, we have the oppor­tu­nity of life, in which we have the free­dom to grow, to learn, to help oth­ers, to cre­ate, to expe­ri­ence, to love.

I’ve also found it par­tic­u­larly effec­tive to add silent med­i­ta­tion for 5–10 min­utes prior, and visu­al­iz­ing every­thing on your grat­i­tude list after the grat­i­tude exer­cise. Try it for yourself!

8. Med­i­ta­tion

Med­i­ta­tion is train­ing for the mind; to calm the noise in our men­tal space, to lower our thought count, to draw out inner wis­dom, and mostly it helps us to rec­og­nize and remain anchored in our divine state.

Regard­less of what is hap­pen­ing exter­nal to us, we have the capac­ity to remain cen­tered, in a state of accep­tance, of flow, of peace, and of love. When we are in this state, we are ratio­nal and have the clar­ity we need to han­dle any sit­u­a­tion with grace, and with min­i­mal stress on our body.

9. Breath­ing Relax­ation Techniques

Most of us are shal­low breathers, and air only stays in the top of our lungs. Deep breath­ing exer­cises will get more oxy­gen into our brains, and into the rest of our body. Try this:

* Sit up straight in your chair, or stand up.
* Loosen up cloth­ing, espe­cially if your stom­ach feels tight.
* Inhale through your nose. Exhale through your mouth.
* Put one hand on your abdom­i­nal area (over your belly).
* When you inhale, feel your hand expand­ing as air is filled up in your diaphragm.
* When you exhale, feel your hand retract­ing to the ini­tial place­ment.
* Count in your mind the num­ber of inhales and exhales, and grad­u­ally level them off such that both take equal counts.
* Slowly, add a count to your exhale.
* Keep adding a count to your exhale until the count for exhales dou­bles that of the count for inhales.
* Repeat this breath­ing rhythm for 5 to 10 times.
* Keep your eyes closed in silence for a few min­utes afterwards.

10. Laugh­ter!

We can­not laugh and be upset at the same time. When we make the phys­i­cal move­ment required to laugh or smile, we instantly feel light-hearted and joyful.

Try it now: give me that beau­ti­ful smile of yours. I want a gen­uine and large smile now! J How do you feel? Do you feel an instant jolt of joy? Did you tem­porar­ily for­get about your problems?

List out a series of movies that make you laugh and stock them up at home. Or meet up with a humor­ous friend who can really get you laugh­ing. For my friend going through the divorce, I pre­scribed Episode 10 of “Sur­vivor Gabon”, he laughed until his stom­ach hurt and told me the next day that he slept very well, with­out once think­ing about the neg­a­tiv­ity that would oth­er­wise trig­ger anger.

11. Forgiveness

For my lit­tle vin­dic­tive ras­cals out there, I know the idea to for­give your ‘enemy’ sounds counter-intuitive. The longer you hold on to the grudge, the more painful emo­tions you will expe­ri­ence, the more tur­bu­lence you are putting on your body, the more dam­age you are inflict­ing on your long-term health and wellness.

Unable to for­give some­one is like drink­ing poi­son and expect­ing the other per­son to die. And there’s no way around it.

12. Snap a Rub­ber Band

Wear an elastic/rubber band around your wrist, at all times. Every time you find your­self hav­ing a thought that would lead to a down­ward neg­a­tive cycle, snap the rub­ber band. It might sting a lit­tle. But this actu­ally trains our mind to avoid trig­ger­ing those thoughts. Pain is an amaz­ing motivator.

13. Iden­tify and Elim­i­nate Your Triggers

Sit down and brain­storm a list of reminders and activ­i­ties that will trig­ger this neg­a­tive emo­tion in us. It might be hear­ing the word ‘divorce’, or someone’s name, or going to a par­tic­u­lar restaurant.

Com­mit to your­self to elim­i­nate the men­tion­ing of these trig­gers from your life. If we know some­thing will upset us, why would we bother trig­ger­ing it?

14. Iden­tify What Anger Brings

List all the things that you’ve gained as a result of being angry. When you’re done, go down this list and count the num­ber of pos­i­tive things that are actu­ally con­ducive to your well­be­ing. By the way, “mak­ing the other per­son suf­fer and feel pain” does not count as “con­ducive to your wellbeing”.

This exer­cise helps us bring more aware­ness, ratio­nal­ity and clar­ity into the situation.

15. Seek Clo­sure. Solve the Problem

To the best of your abil­ity, do not drag any­thing on for the sake of “win­ning” or “being right”; it’s not healthy for any­one involved.

Just because we sur­ren­der to the exter­nal events and choose not to give them any more atten­tion, does not mean that we sit back pas­sively to let oth­ers step all over us.

Take action that will help you move onto the next step, and closer to res­o­lu­tion. Be proac­tive and thought­ful. The faster you can get the prob­lem resolved, the quicker you can set your­self free, mentally.

Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Jedi in Training

Alucard_sabre

Posted in Photoblog | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment