Tag Archives: #Arms Reach

When choos­ing to express upon a peo­ples posi­tion in a cer­tain light just to cast shad­ows of doubt in the mind of the reader, It is thought wise to fic­tion­al­ize the char­ac­ters to dimin­ish the value of the per­son, thing or subject.

This is a typ­i­cal con­cept and polit­i­cal ploy to under­mine and limit the real peo­ple and real events, and for a price the hid­den hand can influ­ence what is fea­tured in the media to cre­ate or mold a gen­eral pub­lic opin­ion in attempts to then gen­er­ate a man­u­fac­tured pub­lic consensus.

With the for­ma­tion and devel­op­ment of a pub­lic con­sen­sus or opin­ion, gov­ern­ment and friends aka “local and world media” can then destroy the per­son, thing or sub­ject with pub­lic sup­port how­ever seduced or mis­guided their beliefs.

Pub­lic opin­ion is used to gauge sup­port for pro­tec­tion of Pub­lic inter­ests when legal cases are brought before the courts or the pub­lic at large, if the judge finds that it is in the best inter­est of the Pub­lic that they carry out what ever deci­sion in favor of pub­lic Inter­est [or public-private cor­po­ra­tion invest­ment per­cep­tion] are act­ing out what is known as pro­tec­tion­ism by omis­sion of infor­ma­tion or cases brought before the court that may dis­rupt pub­lic per­cep­tion and invest­ment potential/capital., which also at time lim­its the rem­edy for the par­ties of interest.

So in fact the court is pro­tect­ing the cor­po­ra­tion as it rep­re­sents the pub­lic and its inter­est, and this is called Pre­ven­ta­tive Jus­tice and it amounts to tax eva­sion by pre­vent­ing jus­tice and awards to pro­tect of is own inter­ests, opin­ion and bankroll.

Does this Sound Fair? Does this look clean? Do your hands need Washing?

I like to point out a few basic tenets of the queens eccle­si­as­ti­cal law, this is a reminder of the laws of the Cana­dian peo­ple and their Sov­er­eign as defender of the faith, as I assert and defend my own, and cor­rect the pub­lic opin­ion of Cor­po­rate–IN-Justice.

“You shall not steal.” Exo­dus 20:15

“If a man causes a field or vine­yard to be grazed over, or lets his beast loose and it feeds in another man’s field, he shall make resti­tu­tion from the best in his own field and in his own vine­yard.” -Exo­dus 22:5

“Clearly no one is jus­ti­fied before God by the law, because, ‘The right­eous will by faith.’ The law is not based on faith; on the con­trary,…” –Gala­tions 3:11.12

“We know that the law is good if one uses it prop­erly. We also know that the law is not made for the right­eous but for law­break­ers and rebels, the ungodly and sin­ful, the unholy and irre­li­gious; for those who kill their fathers or moth­ers, for mur­der­ers, for adul­ter­ers and per­verts, for slave traders and liars and per­jur­ers– and for what­ever else is con­trary to the sound doc­trine that con­forms to the glo­ri­ous gospel of the blessed God, which he entrusted to me.” –I Tim­o­thy 1:8–11

“There is only one Law­giver and Judge, the one who is able to save and destroy.” James 4:12  “Do not add to what I [the LORD] com­mand you and do not sub­tract from it, but keep the com­mands of the Lord your God that I give you.” –Duet. 4:2

“Woe to those who make unjust laws, to those who issue oppres­sive decrees, to deprive the poor of their rights and with­hold jus­tice from the oppressed of my peo­ple, mak­ing wid­ows their prey and rob­bing the father­less.” –Isa­iah 10:1, 2

Below is a sam­ple letter:

sent to the brant­ford­ex­pos­tior indi­cat­ing the char­ac­ter­i­za­tion that dimin­ishes the value of our per­sons, things and sub­jects, and whether they will acknowl­edge it or not is an act of Geno­cide and/or Politicide.

Hello and Greet­ing on this day of Fri­day March 25th 2011,

I have read a few of the expos­i­tors arti­cles regard­ing the onkwe­honwe “six nations peo­ples” and have con­cern of the use of the word you choose to con­tin­u­ously define the asso­ci­ated fam­i­lies “clans” and/or pri­vate mem­bers or to char­ac­ter­ize the asso­ci­ated fam­i­lies or pri­vate mem­bers as so called FACTIONS please pro­vide me with your Def­i­n­i­tion and your Edi­to­r­ial Inter­pre­ta­tion of the selected word [FACTIONS].

If you can not pro­vide me with your under­stand­ing of the word; FACTIONS, I will hon­or­ably ask that you choose a word you under­stand and can pro­vide the def­i­n­i­tion for, the con­tin­ual mis­use of the word FACTIONS may imply that you are in-fact mak­ing a legal deter­mi­na­tion about the pri­vate mem­bers and fam­i­lies asso­ci­ated and linked with the orga­ni­za­tion of the needs of our com­mu­nity at whole or in part, and may pose a threat to the six nations gen­eral liberties.

My under­stand­ing of the word FACTIONS may imply:

1) party strife and intrigue; dis­sen­sion: an era of fac­tion and trea­son.
2) a form of writ­ing or film­mak­ing that treats real peo­ple or events as if they were fic­tional or uses them as an inte­gral part of a fic­tional account.
3) lit­er­ary work com­pris­ing a dra­ma­tized pre­sen­ta­tion of actual events

What I believe you mean by attempt­ing to rede­fine our families/clans/unit/posse as a whole or in part, you may find that the words “Fam­i­lies and Pri­vate Mem­bers”, would have a greater reflec­tion of our peo­ple and may help cor­rect any legal impli­ca­tions or deter­mi­na­tions on your part.

Thank you for your time and con­sid­er­a­tion, I will be for­ward­ing this mes­sage, and await your kind response, if you choose not to reply I will be under the belief and under­stand­ing that you are in agree­ment with my under­stand­ing and def­i­n­i­tion of the word FACTIONS as pro­vided above. [1–3]

Ben­jamin II,
Kanienke’haka; Ambassador-at-Large, and, at-Arms-Reach
Direc­tor of the Pen­tor­toise; Eval­u­a­tion of Admin­is­tra­tive Reg­u­la­tions and Liabilities

http://www.genocidewatch.org/aboutgenocide/8stagesofgenocide.html