Yearly Archives: 2010

The Lines of Tribes

lines of tribes

U.S. Pres­i­dent Barack Obama slipped a sub­tle com­ment into his inau­gu­ra­tion “mind con­trol” speech on Jan­u­ary 20th. When Obama defined Amer­ica as a nation of “Chris­tians and Mus­lims, Jews and Hin­dus and non-believers”, he delib­er­ately left out Indige­nous peo­ples. We have our value systems.

We have our knowl­edge. He sneaked in the inten­tion to ignore us when he said that “the lines of tribe shall soon dis­solve”. To Amer­i­cans the word “tribe” means the Onkwe­honwe. We are the care­tak­ers and trustees of the lands and resources of the world which the New World Order NWO or One World “Gov­ern­ment” must steal to con­trol the world. Our role puts us squarely in the path of this grand scheme of a few bankers, the gov­ern­ments they con­trol and their deadly enforce­ment agencies.

Colo­nial “band or tribal coun­cils” will be put in charge of indige­nous peo­ple where pos­si­ble such as Iraq and Afghanistan. Other Indige­nous peo­ples will be “elim­i­nated” or ignored. It looks like this pro­gram will be run by the United Nations “Inter­na­tional Depart­ment of Indian Affairs” on behalf of the NWO war mongers.

Obama’s main mes­sage is, “If you don’t do it the Amer­i­can way, we will crush you”. It is all the more “devi­ous” because it’s com­ing in this vel­vet glove that claims that it’s being done in a spirit of coöper­a­tion. The real mes­sage is, “we will defeat you”. A new dis­ease is being spread called “Obama fever”. The symp­toms are flag wav­ing, mil­lions gath­er­ing and clap­ping like a bunch of trained seals and hyp­notic sec­tar­ian rap­ping. O-Ba-Ma, O-Ba-Ma! The fol­low­ing are com­ments by “Native Pride” and MNN Mohawk Nation News: Tues­day, Jan­u­ary 20, 2009: Obama: The New Lin­coln? We Hope Not! As the US crowns its new king, the world looks on with [media guided] hope and won­der. The for­mer Illi­nois Sen­a­tor has been com­pared to one of the most pop­u­lar US Pres­i­dents, Abra­ham Lin­coln who was seen as the Great Eman­ci­pa­tor, Freer of the Slaves and the Healer of a Divided Nation. Obama swore his oath of office on Lincoln’s Bible.

Buried in that era of slav­ery and Civil War are a few chap­ters of the Amer­i­can “Indian” Holo­caust of 115 mil­lion, the biggest in all human­ity, that began long before Lin­coln and con­tin­ues today. While Mr. Lin­coln was earn­ing a fake place in his­tory, he signed the Home­stead Act in 1862. This was a law offer­ing huge tracts of our lands to for­eign white set­tle­ment. It was put through with­out con­sul­ta­tion, with­out con­sent and with­out regard for the rights and needs of our people.

Even­tu­ally 1.6 mil­lion home­steads were granted on our land and 270,000,000 acres of our ter­ri­to­ries were pri­va­tized between 1862 and 1986, which is 10% of all lands in the U.S. In the con­flicts that raged over this ille­gal action, thou­sands of Onkwe­honwe men, women and chil­dren were killed and mil­lions of acres of our ter­ri­to­ries remain unlaw­fully occupied.

This has noth­ing to do with hon­esty, courage, fair play and tol­er­ance. Obama’s speech demon­strates clearly his con­cept of loy­alty and patri­o­tism has noth­ing to do with respect for the Onkwe­honwe of Tur­tle Island and our future generations.

Two days after Lin­coln signed the “Eman­ci­pa­tion Procla­ma­tion” in 1863, he signed an order to hang 38 Dakota Sioux in Mankato Min­nesota. There were only about 40 adult men of fight­ing age left out of 400 “pris­on­ers of war”. The U.S. agent refused to feed the Indige­nous peo­ple and was sell­ing the rations that were meant for them. The men begged for food for their peo­ple who were starv­ing to death. He told them to eat grass. They killed him and stuffed his mouth with grass.

These details of Amer­i­can his­tory are rarely vis­ited. John F. Kennedy basks in the glow as a cham­pion of civil rights. He had no prob­lem vio­lat­ing human rights and the treaty with the Seneca Nation. In 1960 he broke a cam­paign promise and approved the flood­ing of thou­sands of acres of Seneca land and the con­struc­tion of the Kinzua Dam in upper New York State.

Today New York State has a black Demo­c­ra­tic Gov­er­nor, David A. Pater­son. He has just signed an ille­gal doc­u­ment autho­riz­ing the destruc­tion of the exist­ing economies of eleven Onkwe­honwe com­mu­ni­ties in the state. It is obvi­ous the Amer­i­cans are the big bul­lies they’ve always been since King Henry VII issued the “Cabot Char­ter” in 1496. It autho­rized the cap­ture and plun­der of any lands belong­ing to non-Christian peo­ple that might be found.

Many Onkwe­honwe have embraced this new U.S. Pres­i­dent Barack Obama. Many of us do not. We hope that he will not earn the tra­di­tional title, “Rah­natakias”, which is our word for U.S. Pres­i­dent. It means “town destroyer”. In 1779 the first Pres­i­dent, George Wash­ing­ton, ordered the geno­cide of all Rotino’shonni:onwe, Iro­quois peo­ple, our com­mu­ni­ties and food sources in the lands between Wyoming and the Cana­dian bor­der. He elim­i­nated over a hun­dred thou­sand of us by famine and disease.

No, Obama is not our pres­i­dent. He is the 44th man to hold the title of Rah­natakias on behalf of the colonists who are occu­py­ing our ter­ri­to­ries. The valid nation-to-nation rela­tions with Onkwe­honwe are always a low pri­or­ity or non-existent for any colo­nial administration.

Peo­ple are look­ing to Mr. Obama for a solu­tion. The true test of his promise of change will come in the treat­ment of the Onkwe­honwe. Is he going to be another two faced reformer, a Wash­ing­ton, a Lin­coln or a Kennedy, who preaches equal­ity and free­dom while crush­ing us under his heel? We refuse to be put under colo­nial “Fed­eral Indian Law” headlocks.

The U.S. will not stop its decline by con­tin­u­ing to dis­pos­sess and oppress us. They have to meet us on the orig­i­nal nation-to-nation terms. We have never sur­ren­dered our juris­dic­tion over our­selves or our resources or our ter­ri­to­ries. They have to acknowl­edge the crimes of the past. They have to reign in their col­o­niz­ing beast. They have to stop feast­ing on the dead bod­ies of our ances­tors. They have to stop danc­ing so hard on our lands and resources that they starve and suf­fo­cate the gen­er­a­tions to come.

Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

What is in a Name, YOU?

1860_census

If there is any rep­re­sen­ta­tive of any depart­ment of gov­ern­ment, Cana­dian or Amer­i­can, who can pro­vide proof that there is any infor­ma­tion offered on this web­site which is incor­rect, erro­neous or ille­gal, then please feel free to inform the web­mas­ter, and it will be promptly cor­rected or removed from this inter­net website.

The pri­mary asser­tions made on this web­site are:

1. The income tax applies only to fic­tional enti­ties called per­sons and/or cit­i­zen.
2. There is absolutely no gov­ern­ment act, statute or law to which any free will human in Canada, or in the USA, is subject.

3. A free will human can enter into a con­tract of servi­tude with the de facto Gov­ern­ment of Canada, or with a Province, or with the de facto Crown in right to either of the above, or with a State[USA], only vol­un­tar­ily and only with full and open knowl­edge of their change of sta­tus to that of plan­ta­tion slave. But, that is not how the Gov­ern­ment has imposed the slave sta­tus upon you. Read my Name Game Blog.

4. The fraud­u­lent trick­ing of peo­ple, through their igno­rance, into the sta­tus of “plan­ta­tion slave” by their using a name cre­ated and owned by the Crown or State is an act of trea­son, by gov­ern­ment, upon the sov­er­eign peo­ple. That Crown or State owned name is the Birth cer­tifi­cate name.

5. Since we, as free will beings, are REQUIRED to use the Crown/State owned legal iden­tity name in all com­merce and in gov­ern­ment com­mu­ni­ca­tion, such use is not a vol­un­tary act on our part, as we must use it by PRIVATE NECESSITY to sus­tain and main­tain our life. That negates the Crown/State claim that we vol­un­tar­ily use it, and thus negates our becom­ing prop­erty owned by the Crown/State through the legal maxim, acces­sio cedit principali.

6. The ‘legal fic­tion name’, AKA: ‘person/taxpayer’, has only the func­tion of an ‘agent in com­merce’ and ‘trustee in trust’ for the free will adult human to which it is associated.

And for Canada specifically:

7. The British Monar­chy ceased to have any rel­e­vance to Canada in 1901, upon the death of Queen Vic­to­ria. All British Mon­archs have been pre­tender Mon­archs of Canada since that date. The office of ‘The Queen’, ‘Her Majesty’ or ‘the Crown’ is the ‘also known as’ name for the City of Lon­don, and its owner, the Vat­i­can, as the Monar­chy of Eng­land have been vas­sal Mon­archs sub­ject to the Pope’s Holy Roman Empire since 1213 AD.

8. The Par­lia­ment of Canada is a de facto usurper of gov­ern­ing power over Canada since 1931, and in real­ity, since 1901; and, in fact is a com­mer­cial cor­po­ra­tion sub­ject to the City of Lon­don. Although we see all court cases where the action is brought by Gov­ern­ment to be “The Queen” or the Latin “Regina”. That only indi­cates that the Queen of Great Britain is act­ing in the role of agent for the City of Lon­don. That is why she does not have to com­ply with her Coro­na­tion oath to defend the indi­vid­ual rights of the peo­ple. That oath is not applic­a­ble to her role as agent for the Crown of the City of London.

Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Why Your Vote is the Problem

george-carlin

Posted in Featured | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

The Citizen’s Council

167328_1789947992402_1350678902_1970856_8171439_n

The suc­cess rate across the province is amaz­ing. It is directly related to our team­work. It took a lit­tle time to deal with the issue of con­science in our com­mu­nity. Just like the pre­sen­ters have told us that the more we engage in these activ­i­ties the less effec­tive our con­science. For­tu­nately, we have now raised a gen­er­a­tion of youth with out a con­science. “They have no con­science! They have a mis­sion!” It is won­der­ful to wit­ness three (3) gen­er­a­tions of the Coun­cil work­ing hand in hand and with­out a con­science. Just think of the activ­i­ties the next gen­er­a­tion will engage in.

Note: Although this arti­cle seems seri­ous it is intended as dark humor, an attempt to remove the vial of secrecy and inno­cence within the fleet­ing net­work of coun­cil­ship under the many hid­den faces of social bod­ies and their pri­or­i­ties, we need to look with both eyes.

Below are just a few of the focal areas where recruit­ment has proven suc­cess­ful and the trust of the tar­get is great.

Ani­mal atten­dants – (walk­ers, sit­ters, etc. even a few vets)

Maids – full access to the target’s home, fam­ily (need we say more)

Teach­ers ( teach­ers gen­er­ally recruit teach­ers) – It is easy to recruit the jus­ti­fi­ably angry teach­ers from the 60’s and 70’s These teach­ers recruit the younger teach­ers and decree a false sense of enti­tle­ment to ensure their par­tic­i­pa­tion in the coun­cil. Those who do not par­tic­i­pate gen­er­ally will remain quiet when they real­ize our num­bers and tactics.

Prop­erty Man­agers are gems – Imag­ine one with­out char­ac­ter and no con­science. (see hous­ing below)

Ware­house and Retail Food Mar­kets – Ini­tially, these venues seemed chal­leng­ing. Now we know and under­stand the power in our numbers-the power in recruit­ment. Once we have deter­mined our tar­get, their loca­tion, their shop­ping habits, favorite foods, etc.-there is no stop­ping us.

Imag­ine this sce­nario:
Tar­get X buys steak every week from Stop & Shop, soda & juice from BJ’s, milk from the cor­ner gro­cer, and the whole fam­ily enjoys eat­ing at Dunkin Donuts on Sat­ur­day morn­ings at 9:30 am, the mother picks up a 24 pack­age of juice every week and then meets her friends at Star­bucks on Wednes­day nights. Remem­ber, “It’s all in the hands!”

Well due to your recruit­ment efforts, we have sev­eral coun­cil mem­bers who work at each loca­tion. Need I say more?

If we can­not han­dle the items in the store, we have “con­nec­tions” at the ware­house level. That is the power of recruit­ment. The super­vi­sor who cre­ates the nec­es­sary work sched­ule may or may not be part of the coun­cil. It does not mat­ter once we have tar­geted some­one. Most indi­vid­u­als fig­ure that it is some sort of bug – or just another case of food poi­son­ing due the neg­li­gence of some one some­where else.

Hous­ing Our lat­est ini­tia­tive is unique and prof­itable for all involved on many dif­fer­ent lev­els. Those who receive the ben­e­fits must be bold, dar­ing and com­mit­ted to the coun­cil initiative.

Apart­ments build­ing, con­do­minium devel­op­ments, and hous­ing enclaves are work­ing suc­cess­fully. Sim­ply, we move into a gen­eral area and tar­get our target’s hous­ing need or desire. We deter­mine where the tar­get will live though they may assume their choice is inde­pen­dent. As usual, we never let the indi­vid­ual know about our rela­tion­ships. We are all just neigh­bors so at one point the tar­get will look to one of us for sup­port. In this sit­u­a­tion, we can bet­ter man­age coun­cil efforts.

We can gain access to their unit, their mail, (many mail car­ri­ers in the coun­cil) their car, the works and one coun­cil mem­ber cer­tainly will gain their trust.

To avoid sus­pi­cion all the coun­cil mem­bers resid­ing within target’s hous­ing arena par­tic­i­pate in uncon­scionable activities.

This way it will appear that, the per­son is para­noid if they dare sug­gest that so many indi­vid­u­als are involved. It also allows us to apply pres­sure to the target-hopefully to ini­ti­ate a ner­vous breakdown.

The pres­sure applied at home and work will crush the spirit and bring the tar­get into submission.

This only hap­pens through team­work. Even­tu­ally, we would like to have as many of these Hous­ing tar­get sites avail­able across the state in every neighborhood.

Side ben­e­fit in Coun­cil Tar­get Hous­ing: Free­bies from tar­gets house (lim­ited amount to avoid suspicion-just enough mak­ing them feel like they are for­get­ful which con­tributes to their break down).

1. Destroy­ing that Ole’ Con­science Once and for All
We must not allow con­science to hin­der our work. Lec­ture and small dis­cus­sion groups will dis­cuss how to address issue of con­science until it is no longer an issue

2. Estab­lish­ing False Friend­ships
This is cru­cial because we must know who is join­ing our orga­ni­za­tion. What­ever a per­son needs, we will become, say or do, for the ben­e­fit of the Coun­cil. That is cru­cial why we must deal with our con­sciences if we are to advance our efforts.

3. Non-Discriminatory (sce­nar­ios will be pre­sented on how to work it)
On the sur­face, we do not dis­crim­i­nate. We have a posi­tion for everyone-but not every­one can access cer­tain posi­tions in the coun­cil. How­ever, we recruit every­one of every nation­al­ity, race, creed, sex and color under the guise of union. Alter­na­tively, what­ever the per­son we are recruit­ing “needs” to hear that is what we present to them. (We become all things to all people!)

4. False Face
Mini work­shops will role-play how to main­tain a false face under pres­sure. We must at all times present the face of inno­cence to our co-workers, fam­ily and pub­lic. It is essen­tial that you address the issue of your con­science in order to be suc­cess­ful with the false face under pressure.

5. Sub­ver­sives
If you are sens­ing a sub­ver­sive on your job, in your neigh­bor­hood or school talk to your area leader. Make sure that you have exam­ples of the sub­ver­sive behav­ior so you can begin to the tar­get the indi­vid­ual but remain “inno­cent” in your demeanor.

· I have no con­science! I have a mis­sion!
· I have no con­science! I become all things to all peo­ple to pro­mote Coun­cil Agenda!
· I have no con­science! I will do any­thing in the name of the Cit­i­zens Coun­cil!
· I will destroy many to tar­get one! I have no con­science! I have no con­science!
· I can and will do the uncon­scionable! I can! I have and will con­tinue to do the
uncon­scionable! I have no conscience!

Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Understanding the Problem

First you have to under­stand the problem.

  • What is the unknown?
  • What are the data?
  • What is the condition?
  • Is it pos­si­ble to sat­isfy the condition?
  • Is the con­di­tion suf­fi­cient to deter­mine the unknown?
  • Or is it insuf­fi­cient? Or redun­dant? Or contradictory?

Draw a fig­ure. Intro­duce suit­able notation.

  • Sep­a­rate the var­i­ous parts of the con­di­tion. Can you write them down?

Devis­ing a Plan.
Find the con­nec­tion between the data and the unknown. You may be obliged to con­sider aux­il­iary prob­lems if an imme­di­ate con­nec­tion can­not be found. You should obtain even­tu­ally a plan of the solution.

  • Have you seen it before? Or have you seen the same prob­lem in a slightly dif­fer­ent form?
  • Do you know a related prob­lem? Do you know a the­o­rem that could be useful?

Look at the unknown! And try to think of a famil­iar prob­lem hav­ing the same or a sim­i­lar unknown.

Here is a prob­lem related to yours and solved before.

  • Could you use it?
  • Could you use its result?
  • Could you use its method?
  • Should you intro­duce some aux­il­iary ele­ment in order to make its use possible?
  • Could you restate the prob­lem? Could you restate it still differently?

Go back to the definitions.

If you can­not solve the pro­posed prob­lem try to solve first some related prob­lem. Could you imag­ine a more acces­si­ble related prob­lem? A more gen­eral prob­lem? A more spe­cial prob­lem? An anal­o­gous prob­lem? Can you solve a part of the prob­lem.? Keep only a part of the con­di­tion, drop the other part; how far is the unknown then deter­mined, how can it vary? Could you derive some­thing use­ful from the data? Could you think of other data appro­pri­ate to deter­mine the unknown? Could you change the unknown or the data, or both if nec­es­sary, so that the new unknown and the new data are nearer to each other?

  • Did you use all the data?
  • Did you use the whole condition?
  • Have you taken into account all essen­tial notions involved in the problem?

Car­ry­ing out the Plan.
Car­ry­ing out your plan of the solu­tion, check each step.

  • Can you see clearly that the step is correct?
  • Can you prove that it is correct?

Look­ing back.
Exam­ine the solu­tion obtained.

  • Can you check the result?
  • Can you check the argument?
  • Can you derive the result differently?
  • Can you see it at a glance?
  • Can you use the result, or the method, for some other problem?
Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Honda Ruckus in Caledonia

Posted in Photoblog | Tagged | Leave a comment

NOTICE: Declaration of Unincorporation, and, Revocation of consent to be governed

You can't fix stupid

http://brantfordexpositor.ca/Blogs/ViewCommunityPage.aspx?BlogID=8742
http://www.scribd.com/doc/39403536/Notice-to-the-general-public-of-Brantford

Posted in Pentortoise | National Asset Recovery Projects | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Ferris Wheel

Posted in Photoblog | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Teach Well, Learn Well, The Basics of Civics ~ LAB 1

logo_civics

Because I write about pol­i­tics, peo­ple are ask­ing me the best way to teach chil­dren how our sys­tem of gov­ern­ment works. I tell them that they can give their own chil­dren a basic civics course right in their own homes.

In my own expe­ri­ence as a father, I have dis­cov­ered sev­eral sim­ple devices that can illus­trate to a child’s mind the prin­ci­ples on which the mod­ern state deals with its cit­i­zens. You may find them help­ful, too.

For exam­ple, I used to play the sim­ple card game WAR with my son. After a while, when he thor­oughly under­stood that the higher rank­ing cards beat the lower rank­ing ones, I cre­ated a new game I called GOVERNMENT. In this game, I was Gov­ern­ment, and I won every trick, regard­less of who had the bet­ter card. My boy soon lost inter­est in my new game, but I like to think it taught him a valu­able les­son for later in life.

When your child is a lit­tle older, you can teach him about our tax sys­tem in a way that is easy to grasp. Offer him, say, $10 to mow the lawn. When he has mowed it and asks to be paid, with­hold $5 and explain that this is income tax. Give $1 to his younger brother, and tell him that this is “fair”. Also, explain that you need the other $4 your­self to cover the admin­is­tra­tive costs of divid­ing the money. When he cries, tell him he is being “self­ish” and “greedy”. Later in life he will thank you.

Make as many rules as pos­si­ble. Leave the rea­sons for them obscure. Enforce them arbi­trar­ily. Accuse your child of break­ing rules you have never told him about. Keep him anx­ious that he may be vio­lat­ing com­mands you haven’t yet issued. Instill in him the feel­ing that rules are utterly irra­tional. This will pre­pare him for liv­ing under demo­c­ra­tic government.

When your child has matured suf­fi­ciently to under­stand how the judi­cial sys­tem works, set a bed­time for him and then send him to bed an hour early. When he tear­fully accuses you of break­ing the rules, explain that you made the rules and you can inter­pret them in any way that seems appro­pri­ate to you, accord­ing to chang­ing con­di­tions. This will pre­pare him for the Supreme Court’s con­cept of the U.S. Con­sti­tu­tion as a “liv­ing document”.

Promise often to take him to the movies or the zoo, and then, at the appointed hour, recline in an easy chair with a news­pa­per and tell him you have changed your plans. When he screams, “But you promised!”, explain to him that it was a cam­paign promise.

Every now and then, with­out warn­ing, slap your child. Then explain that this is defense. Tell him that you must be vig­i­lant at all times to stop any poten­tial enemy before he gets big enough to hurt you. This, too, your child will appre­ci­ate, not right at that moment, maybe, but later in life.

At times your child will nat­u­rally express dis­con­tent with your meth­ods. He may even give voice to a petu­lant wish that he lived with another fam­ily. To fore­stall and min­i­mize this reac­tion, tell him how lucky he is to be with you the most lov­ing and indul­gent par­ent in the world, and recount lurid sto­ries of the cru­el­ties of other par­ents. This will make him loyal to you and, later, recep­tive to school­room claims that the Amer­ica of the post­mod­ern wel­fare state is still the best and freest coun­try on Earth.

This brings me to the most impor­tant child-rearing tech­nique of all: lying. Lie to your child con­stantly. Teach him that words mean nothing–or rather that the mean­ings of words are con­tin­u­ally “evolv­ing”, and may be tomor­row the oppo­site of what they are today.

Some read­ers may object that this is a poor way to raise a child. A few may even call it child abuse. But that’s the whole point: Child abuse is the best prepa­ra­tion for adult life under our form of GOVERNMENT.

Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Goal Orientation, the Dehumanization Trap

goale

STEPHEN FRY: WHAT I WISH I’D KNOWN WHEN I WAS 18 from Peter Samuel­son on Vimeo.

Peter Samuel­son, inter­viewer. 29 April 2010.

One thing we have noticed is that dis­cus­sions regard­ing mul­ti­cul­tur­al­ism and the inte­gra­tion of minori­ties are gain­ing momen­tum, in line with the main­stream polit­i­cal devel­op­ment and the demo­graphic changes tak­ing place. These issues con­sti­tute the found­ing ele­ments — col­lec­tively and sep­a­rately — of a mod­ern, well-functioning soci­ety as well as of the well-being of dif­fer­ent eth­nic groups.

The focus mainly is on the con­cept of mul­ti­cul­tur­al­ism and the role it should or could play in true mutual inte­gra­tion in diverse col­lec­tive societies.

All North Amer­i­can coun­tries are grap­pling with sim­i­lar issues and are apply­ing home-grown reme­dies to find solu­tions. Few solu­tions have suc­ceeded, while most have had dis­as­trous effects on fun­da­men­tal human rights, cit­i­zen­ship and even mutual integration.

We must have knowl­edge of other coun­tries, soci­eties and cul­tures, and develop the abil­ity to col­lect and use knowl­edge and infor­ma­tion from all over the world in solv­ing our own prob­lems. Edu­ca­tion can no longer use one-way instruc­tion in which a teacher crams stu­dents with arranged knowledge.

Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments